Teams

Rike 3.5W 18s Mon AM

2024 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Mary Beth Hartman
published
3.47
Danielle Wright
published 3.5
3.45
Katelyn Chapman
published
3.35
Rebecca Hartsough
published
3.34
Lauren Timcheck
published
3.29
Kathryn Campbell
published
Brandi Jacques
published 3.5
3.21
Linda Lowman
published
3.12
Kelly Rike
published
3.11
Amber Trbonja
published 3.5
2.94
Betty Haggard
published 3.5
2.58
Sherry Tibbs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Lowman + Amber Trbonja1733% games−4.5% vs expected
Sherry Tibbs + Amber Trbonja134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Lowman + Rebecca Hartsough224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Rike + Rebecca Hartsough134 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Hartsough + Lauren Timcheck123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Beth Hartman
91W–66L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Danielle Wright
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Katelyn Chapman
53W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Rebecca Hartsough
40W–34L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.35
Lauren Timcheck
29W–28L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Kathryn Campbell
25W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Brandi Jacques
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Lowman
43W–44L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Kelly Rike
8W–21L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.12
3.5
Amber Trbonja
11W–34L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Betty Haggard
5W–23L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
Sherry Tibbs
4W–21L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.