Teams

KY/HEN/SPENCER, Donna Combo

2026 USTA COMBO DOUBLES 18 AND OVER FALL HENDERSON · 6.5 Ladies

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-23vs KY/HEN/INGALLS, LizLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Flittner / Leanne Lester vs Debra Decker / Elizabeth Ingalls3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMelanie Humbert / Donna Spencer vs Monica Warren / Paula Edwards6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Diehl / Mary Lawrence Childs vs Jane Quehl / Natalia Fletcher3-6, 5-7
2026-08-09vs KY/HEN/INGALLS, LizLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Ettensohn / Amelia DeMello vs Debra Decker / Elizabeth Ingalls1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Flittner / Paige Warren vs Stacy Lambert / Paula Edwards2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Witten / Jill Carr vs Dawn Dickey / Katie Perkins3-6, 0-6
2026-08-02vs KY/HEN/INGALLS, LizWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Ettensohn / Amelia DeMello vs Monica Warren / Jane Quehl0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Bordenet / Brenda Witten vs Karen Kineman / Elizabeth Ingalls3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Lawrence Childs / Leanne Lester vs Penny Henkel / Dawn Dickey2-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Melanie Humbert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Julie Flittner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Leanne Lester
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Mary Lawrence Childs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Kathy Ettensohn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Amelia DeMello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Paige Warren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Jane Diehl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Catherine Bordenet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Brenda Witten
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.41
Donna Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Jill Carr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Ettensohn + Amelia DeMello3444% games+0.4% vs expected
Catherine Bordenet + Brenda Witten21237% games+0.2% vs expected
Jane Diehl + Amelia DeMello0725% games−7.1% vs expected
Jane Diehl + Kathy Ettensohn2441% gamesnot enough data
Amelia DeMello + Leanne Lester1440% gamesnot enough data
Jane Diehl + Leanne Lester134 matchesnot enough data
Julie Flittner + Amelia DeMello123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Flittner + Paige Warren123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Humbert
42W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.20
Julie Flittner
98W–65L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.15
Leanne Lester
19W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Mary Lawrence Childs
22W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Kathy Ettensohn
36W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Amelia DeMello
29W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Paige Warren
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Jane Diehl
27W–83L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Catherine Bordenet
24W–69L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
2.5
Brenda Witten
13W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Donna Spencer
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Jill Carr
11W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.