Teams

KY/HEN/INGALLS, Liz

2026 USTA COMBO DOUBLES 18 AND OVER FALL HENDERSON · 6.5 Ladies

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-23vs KY/HEN/SPENCER, Donna ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebra Decker / Elizabeth Ingalls vs Julie Flittner / Leanne Lester6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMonica Warren / Paula Edwards vs Melanie Humbert / Donna Spencer3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJane Quehl / Natalia Fletcher vs Jane Diehl / Mary Lawrence Childs6-3, 7-5
2026-08-09vs KY/HEN/SPENCER, Donna ComboWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebra Decker / Elizabeth Ingalls vs Kathy Ettensohn / Amelia DeMello6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStacy Lambert / Paula Edwards vs Julie Flittner / Paige Warren6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDawn Dickey / Katie Perkins vs Brenda Witten / Jill Carr6-3, 6-0
2026-08-02vs KY/HEN/SPENCER, Donna ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesMonica Warren / Jane Quehl vs Kathy Ettensohn / Amelia DeMello0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Kineman / Elizabeth Ingalls vs Catherine Bordenet / Brenda Witten6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPenny Henkel / Dawn Dickey vs Mary Lawrence Childs / Leanne Lester2-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Debra Decker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Jane Quehl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Penny Henkel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Karen Kineman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Elizabeth Ingalls
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Paula Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Stacy Lambert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Monica Warren
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Katrina Cutshaw
published
2.96
Dawn Dickey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Katie Perkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Dickey + Katie Perkins231850% games+6.1% vs expected
Debra Decker + Katrina Cutshaw5652% gamesnot enough data
Katrina Cutshaw + Elizabeth Ingalls3347% gamesnot enough data
Jane Quehl + Stacy Lambert303 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Lambert + Debra Decker303 matchesnot enough data
Paula Edwards + Elizabeth Ingalls123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debra Decker
139W–132L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Jane Quehl
60W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.15
Penny Henkel
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Karen Kineman
10W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
20%79%<1%
3.12
Elizabeth Ingalls
25W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
Paula Edwards
28W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Stacy Lambert
60W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.07
Monica Warren
28W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Katrina Cutshaw
14W–18L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Dawn Dickey
96W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Katie Perkins
30W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.