Teams

S&D

2024 Coed Spring · 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.30 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-04-13vs ConitaWon 31
L#1 Female DoublesLori Kaltenbach / Song Bliss vs Suzanne Davis / Conita Mullett0-6
W#1 Female SinglesBrook Connolly vs Suzanne Davis6-4
W#1 Male DoublesAnthony Brooks / Douglas Bliss vs Konrad Kaltemborn / Michael Leonard6-1
W#1 Male SinglesAnthony Brooks vs Konrad Kaltemborn6-3
2024-04-06vs Served With IceWon 31
W#1 Female DoublesLori Kaltenbach / Song Bliss vs Lauren Leadbetter / Jina Malone6-0
W#1 Female SinglesLori Kaltenbach vs Skylar McCasland6-4
L#1 Male SinglesAnthony Brooks vs Fogarty Burton2-6
W#1 Mixed DoublesSong Bliss / Douglas Bliss vs Lauren Leadbetter / Kyle Leadbetter6-0
2024-03-30vs WyzzesWon 40
W#1 Female DoublesBrook Connolly / Song Bliss vs Christie Wyzykowski / Penny Rohacek6-1
W#1 Female SinglesLori Kaltenbach vs Janet Bidwell6-1
W#1 Male DoublesAnthony Brooks / Douglas Bliss vs Gregory Bidwell / Tom Wolforth6-3
W#1 Male SinglesAnthony Brooks vs Gregory Bidwell6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1S&D03135552
2Wyzzes0399963
3Conita038101075
4Served With Ice036121285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Brook Connolly
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Lori Kaltenbach
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
3.02
Anthony Brooks
usually #1 Male Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.79
Douglas Bliss
usually #1 Male Doubles 67%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.74
Song Bliss
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Kent Kaltenbach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Douglas Bliss + Lori Kaltenbach5352% games−5.1% vs expected
Lori Kaltenbach + Kent Kaltenbach131444% gamesnot enough data
Douglas Bliss + Song Bliss13563% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brook Connolly
36W–22L career · type M · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Lori Kaltenbach
74W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Anthony Brooks
110W–108L career · 3 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Douglas Bliss
52W–43L career · type M · 3 lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
2.79
3
Song Bliss
63W–86L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
2.74
Kent Kaltenbach
14W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.