Teams

Team 6 VolleyVixens

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer Indoor · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-27vs Team 5 Spin DoctorsWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichelle O'Brien / Debra Ciesar vs Nazarina Phommachanh / Joanne Swain6-7, 2-4
W#1 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Cynthia Pearson6-3, 5-1
W#2 DoublesLori Fisher / Laura Riesenberg vs Kathleen Reilly-Olson / Cynthia Grubbs6-2, 4-4
2022-07-24Won 20
W#1 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Patrina Clark6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLena Luo / Lucy Dong vs Jennifer Malloy / Emilie Schreiner7-5, 6-2
2022-07-23vs Team 3 RJ Net Assets.Won 20
W#1 DoublesDebra Ciesar / Michelle O'Brien vs Karen Boulineaux / Genevieve Raphael6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Hiam Eljazzar6-0, 6-0
2022-07-20vs Team 8 Slice GirlsLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Sara Franklin vs Kristin Kahn / Ayako Doi6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDebra Ciesar vs Jacqueline Corcoran3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMary Hannigan / Lena Luo vs Mary Beth Cole / Elisa Leak5-7, 4-2
2022-07-17vs Team 7Won 10
W#1 DoublesLucy Dong / Lena Luo vs Wendy Wicker / Margaret Cornelius6-1, 6-1
2022-07-15vs Team 9 Sassy StringsLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Talotta / Laura Riesenberg vs Carey Mottet / Yolanda Tsai2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-07-08vs Team 2 Court of AppealsWon 10
W#1 SinglesDebra Ciesar vs Elisa Joyner6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Eleanor McManus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Lucy Dong
published
3.02
Lena Luo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Sara Franklin
published
2.75
Debra Ciesar
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Laura Riesenberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Lori Fisher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucy Dong + Lena Luo2451% games−3.2% vs expected
Laura Riesenberg + Lena Luo5161% gamesnot enough data
Debra Ciesar + Laura Riesenberg303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eleanor McManus
187W–113L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Lucy Dong
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Lena Luo
51W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.02
Sara Franklin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Debra Ciesar
98W–91L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Laura Riesenberg
88W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
Lori Fisher
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.