Teams

Team 8 Slice Girls

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer Indoor · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.07 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-25vs Team 9 Sassy StringsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Snyder / Kristin Kahn vs Aida Blumen / Lynnita Montague-Daddio6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKylie Gaskins / Mary Beth Cole vs Patricia Hathaway / Carthina Marple6-4, 6-2
2022-07-24vs Team 2 Court of AppealsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Corcoran / Kylie Gaskins vs Barbara Seligman / Lenora Spencer6-2, 6-5
W#1 SinglesKristin Kahn vs Margaret Roberts6-1, 6-2
2022-07-20vs Team 6 VolleyVixensLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Kahn / Ayako Doi vs Laura Riesenberg / Sara Franklin1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-07-17vs Team 5 Spin DoctorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKylie Gaskins / Kristin Kahn vs Tiffany Malloy / Kathleen Reilly-Olson6-1, 6-3
2022-07-15vs Team 4 Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#1 DoublesYvette Chisholm / Kristin Kahn vs Andrea Davis / Laura McNicholl6-7
2022-07-08vs Team 7Won 10
W#1 DoublesYvette Chisholm / Kristin Kahn vs Margaret Cornelius / Elizabeth Nicholson7-6, 2-1
2022-06-27vs Team 3 RJ Net Assets.Split 11
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Corcoran / Kylie Gaskins vs Sally Keith / Sheryl Morley2-6, 5-5
W#2 DoublesHelen Zassypkina / Laura Mattis vs Marcy Davidson / Lena Ferris7-5, 4-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Kristin Kahn
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.98
Kylie Gaskins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Alexandra Braun
published 3
Helen Zassypkina
published 3
2.66
Laura Mattis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Ayako Doi
published 3
2.44
Elisa Leak
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Kahn + Kylie Gaskins8559% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristin Kahn
128W–147L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Kylie Gaskins
140W–132L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Alexandra Braun
8W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Helen Zassypkina
7W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Laura Mattis
77W–98L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Ayako Doi
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Elisa Leak
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.