Teams

Sych

2023 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-03vs FunDubsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Digenan / Tena Carter vs Kimberly Caponigro / Jennifer Kink3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-31vs ArronWon 10
W#1 DoublesAntonette Wood / Mary Digenan vs Kelly Arron / Julie Yee2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-26vs Sun-TWon 10
W#1 DoublesTena Carter / Mary Digenan vs Dawn Apacible / Marla Aginian2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-07-20vs NancyHollyLost 01
L#1 DoublesTetyana Sych / Antonette Wood vs Nancy Edwards / Holly Ng1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-14vs Scott/LampittLost 01
L#1 DoublesTetyana Sych / Antonette Wood vs Alison Scott / Monica Fliflet3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Tetyana Sych
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Mary Digenan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Antonette Wood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Tena Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Digenan + Antonette Wood7456% games+8.0% vs expected
Tena Carter + Antonette Wood12855% games+3.6% vs expected
Tena Carter + Mary Digenan5355% games−0.1% vs expected
Antonette Wood + Tetyana Sych1544% games−2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tetyana Sych
132W–185L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Mary Digenan
62W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Antonette Wood
152W–134L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Tena Carter
51W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.