Teams

WEY:All About That Baseline:Clemente

2023 EMA Tri Level · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-06vs WEY:Tossin'balls:Leveille/HibbardLost 01
L#1 DoublesSue Brewster / Kaitlin Henriksen vs Nicole Dias / Kristen Thibeault1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesSue Brewster / Kaitlin Henriksen vs Elizabeth MacFarlane / Stacey Bartlett5-7, 1-6
2023-11-05vs KIG:Kingsbury:Simeone/KylanderLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Neelon / Sharyn Clemente vs Emily Goodman-Simeone / Emily Mongello0-6, 1-6
2023-10-22vs LAK:Lakeville:Howard/LiangLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaitlin Henriksen / ANNELISE ARAUJO vs Vassilissa Kozoulina / Tanya Chotibut6-7, 1-6
2023-10-15vs WEY:Tossin'balls:Leveille/HibbardLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaitlin Henriksen / Sue Brewster vs Kristen Thibeault / Jennifer Hoffman3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesKaitlin Henriksen / Kathleen Neelon vs Stacey Bartlett / Elizabeth MacFarlane4-6, 2-6
2023-10-01vs KIG:Kingsbury:Simeone/KylanderLost 01
L#1 DoublesANNELISE ARAUJO / Kaitlin Henriksen vs Emily Mongello / Allison Farquharson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
ANNELISE ARAUJO
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Kaitlin Henriksen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Sharyn Clemente
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Sue Brewster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Neelon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ANNELISE ARAUJO + Kaitlin Henriksen3745% games+1.7% vs expected
Sue Brewster + Sharyn Clemente2448% gamesnot enough data
Sue Brewster + Kaitlin Henriksen0533% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Neelon + Sue Brewster033 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Neelon + Kaitlin Henriksen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
ANNELISE ARAUJO
10W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
Kaitlin Henriksen
39W–54L career · 6 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Sharyn Clemente
41W–43L career · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Sue Brewster
50W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Kathleen Neelon
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.