Teams

KIG:Kingsbury:Simeone/Kylander

2023 EMA Tri Level · 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.25 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-10vs WEY:Tossin'balls:Leveille/HibbardWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Mongello / Allison Farquharson vs Susan Koslow / Kristen Thibeault6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDeborah Kylander / Emily Mongello vs Stacey Bartlett / Elizabeth MacFarlane6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-11-19vs LAK:Lakeville:Howard/LiangLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Farquharson / Emily Goodman-Simeone vs Carolynn Crabtree / Alisa Taylor6-7, 5-7
W#1 DoublesEmily Goodman-Simeone / Emily Mongello vs Kathleen Neelon / Sharyn Clemente6-0, 6-1
2023-10-22vs WEY:Tossin'balls:Leveille/HibbardLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Farquharson / Emily Mongello vs Jennifer Hoffman / Kristen Thibeault7-5, 4-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesEmily Mongello / Deborah Kylander vs Elizabeth MacFarlane / Stacey Bartlett6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesEmily Mongello / Allison Farquharson vs ANNELISE ARAUJO / Kaitlin Henriksen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-09-24vs LAK:Lakeville:Howard/LiangLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Goodman-Simeone / Deborah Kylander vs Vassilissa Kozoulina / Tanya Chotibut4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Emily Goodman-Simeone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Deborah Kylander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.79
Allison Farquharson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Emily Mongello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Goodman-Simeone + Allison Farquharson6164% games+14.4% vs expected
Deborah Kylander + Emily Goodman-Simeone9458% games+11.2% vs expected
Deborah Kylander + Emily Mongello5163% games+8.8% vs expected
Deborah Kylander + Allison Farquharson4249% gamesnot enough data
Allison Farquharson + Emily Mongello314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emily Goodman-Simeone
41W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Deborah Kylander
61W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Allison Farquharson
26W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Emily Mongello
17W–11L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.