Teams

Casey/Nolan

2021 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Colleen Nolan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Tina Farrelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.28
Erin Casey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2021-08-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Casey / Tina Farrelly vs Reiko Maeda / Angie Gordon6-2, 6-4
2021-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Casey / Colleen Nolan vs Colleen Kellogg / Garrene Mcgale6-2, 7-6
2021-07-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Casey / Colleen Nolan vs Kacie Wise / KEELEY PLOMBON6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-07-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Casey / Colleen Nolan vs Deanna McKay / Jennifer Woodard6-2, 6-1
2021-06-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Casey / Colleen Nolan vs Gabriela McIntosh / Cate Harrington4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Casey / Colleen Nolan vs Patricia Eargle / Diane Macdonald6-1, 6-1
2021-06-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Casey / Colleen Nolan vs Susan Hope / Kathy Rogers6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Colleen Nolan
177W–79L career
1%99%0%
3.74
4
Tina Farrelly
115W–45L career
14%86%0%
3.58
3.5
Erin Casey
142W–91L career
0%99%1%
3.28

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.