Teams

CSRC HENRY

2021 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-27vs MEMPK SWENSONWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori McPherson / Tony Adkison vs Susan Lozanov / Mark Lehrer6-2, 6-2
2021-06-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Doug Baker vs Judy Mitchell / Ruben Pena5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-06-13vs CCOC PARKERLost 02
L#2 DoublesTony Adkison / Kady Hommel vs Roni Schlagel / Robert Irwin6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDoug Baker / Carolayne Henry vs Peter Holnback / Trista Niemann5-7, 2-6
2021-06-06vs MEMPK SWENSONWon 10
W#2 DoublesDoug Baker / Carolayne Henry vs Tom Bulloch / Jennifer Kapitan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-30vs PBTC MITCHELLLost 01
L#1 DoublesTony Adkison / Carolayne Henry vs Marcel Pieters / Leah Ann Tucker0-6, 3-6
2021-05-23vs CCOC PARKERLost 02
L#1 DoublesTony Adkison / Kady Hommel vs Jessica Hilton / Rick Parker6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Doug Baker vs Daria Parker / Pat Pottger4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kady Hommel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Carolayne Henry
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Tony Adkison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.29
James McPherson
published 4
3.24
Lori McPherson
published
2.96
Kevin Wells
published
Doug Baker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tony Adkison + Karla Hansen Adkison3252% gamesnot enough data
Lori McPherson + James McPherson033 matchesnot enough data
Tony Adkison + Kady Hommel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kady Hommel
102W–88L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Carolayne Henry
122W–137L career · 5 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Tony Adkison
56W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
3.45
4
James McPherson
5W–25L career · type S · no lines in 2021
95%5%<1%
3.29
Lori McPherson
25W–38L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
Kevin Wells
6W–21L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
2.96
Doug Baker
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karla Hansen Adkison
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.