Teams

MEMPK SWENSON

2021 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-27vs CSRC HENRYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Lozanov / Mark Lehrer vs Lori McPherson / Tony Adkison2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKerwin Swenson / Candace McCollett vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-22vs CCOC PARKERLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Lehrer / Candace McCollett vs Michael Bagwell / Karen Ross1-6, 4-6
2021-06-13vs PBTC MITCHELLLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Lehrer / Shelly Shepard vs Marcel Pieters / Stephanie Gifford6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2021-06-06vs CSRC HENRYLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Lehrer / Candace McCollett vs James McPherson / Lori McPherson1-6, 2-6
2021-05-30vs CCOC PARKERLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Lehrer / Jennifer Kapitan vs Michael Bagwell / Sara Breese2-6, 2-6
2021-05-23vs PBTC MITCHELLWon 10
W#1 DoublesCandace McCollett / Mark Lehrer vs Stephanie Gifford / Larry Nugent6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bruce Wadman
published 4
3.65
Candace McCollett
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.62
Mark Lehrer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.18
Shelly Shepard
published
3.01
Tom Bulloch
published
2.58
Kerwin Swenson
published
Jennifer Kapitan
published
Robert Provost
published
Susan Lozanov
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candace McCollett + Kerwin Swenson1439% games−1.5% vs expected
Candace McCollett + Mark Lehrer81344% games−5.3% vs expected
Tom Bulloch + Jennifer Kapitan1542% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bruce Wadman
8W–28L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Candace McCollett
58W–104L career · 8 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Mark Lehrer
24W–60L career · 6 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.62
Shelly Shepard
21W–32L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
Tom Bulloch
12W–16L career · no lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
3.01
Kerwin Swenson
15W–30L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
2.58
Jennifer Kapitan
43W–38L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Provost
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Lozanov
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.