Teams

Aiya

2023 Tri-One Doubles League · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-10-01vs GOFWon 10
W#1 DoublesNoelle Chun / Emily Louis vs Ayelish Kerber / Patricia Moore6-0, 6-1
2023-09-24vs GOFWon 10
W#1 DoublesJUDY Guo / Noelle Chun vs Patricia Moore / Ayelish Kerber6-4, 6-3
2023-09-16vs Girls Just Wanna Have FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Jyo / Emily Louis vs Kathryn Young / Anna Womack6-2, 6-1
2023-09-10vs Dare DoublesWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Jyo / JUDY Guo vs Dionne Kahale-Sirp / Alexis Steele6-0, 6-3
2023-09-03vs Mini Miss HitsWon 10
W#1 DoublesNoelle Chun / Emily Louis vs Asami Kramberg / Susan Locquiao6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-08-27vs Warrior PrincessWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Jyo / Emily Louis vs Trisha Inafuku / Caylie Uyema6-1, 6-0
2023-08-13vs Girls Just Wanna Have FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Jyo / JUDY Guo vs Karen Yamaguchi / Laura Shimada6-3, 6-3
2023-08-06vs Dare DoublesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJUDY Guo / Noelle Chun vs Dionne Kahale-Sirp / Alexis Steele3-6, 3-6
2023-07-30vs Mini Miss HitsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJUDY Guo / Erin Jyo vs Shiori Tang / Letha DeCaires6-0, 6-0
2023-07-23vs Warrior PrincessWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Jyo / Emily Louis vs Alyssa Watanabe / Caylie Uyema6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Aiya9191353
2Warrior Princess7373649
3Girls Just Wanna Have Fun46461296
4GOF373715102
5Mini Miss Hits01001020121

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Erin Jyo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
JUDY Guo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Noelle Chun
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Emily Louis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Louis + Erin Jyo6167% games+17.0% vs expected
JUDY Guo + Noelle Chun5259% games+8.0% vs expected
Erin Jyo + JUDY Guo5454% games+5.3% vs expected
Emily Louis + JUDY Guo4250% games+4.3% vs expected
Emily Louis + Noelle Chun6356% games+4.3% vs expected
Erin Jyo + Noelle Chun404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Jyo
83W–20L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.55
JUDY Guo
47W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Noelle Chun
72W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.42
Emily Louis
81W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.