Teams

Minions/Vongsachang/Mountain View

2024 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-26vs Wallenberg/Nguyen/San JoseWon 30
W#1 DoublesChandra Thomas / Noa Ramo-Larios vs Nicole YEN / Stephanie Wei7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarie Dolcini / Elizabeth Carey vs Helen Lam / Catherine Puzon6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJunko Bice / Yukari Seki vs Dejia Tang / Chunguang He6-4, 6-0
2024-10-26vs Hit Happy/Van Slyke/PleasantonWon 30
W#1 DoublesChandra Thomas / Qingqing Zong vs Raquel Atkin / Kathleen Larragueta6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEllen Gazen / Emily Ling vs Athena Lofquist / Joanna Broda-Schunck6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Carey / Ann Zabat vs Lual Lualhati / Robin Hultgren6-0, 6-1
2024-10-25vs Double Shots/Fortner/SacramentoWon 21
W#1 DoublesChandra Thomas / Noa Ramo-Larios vs Jane Fortner / Lianne Decker4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJessica Berg / Emily Ling vs Carolyn Blythe / McKenzie Helvick1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJunko Bice / Yukari Seki vs Kristen Johnson / Sara Pallas6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Qingqing Zong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.31
Noa Ramo-Larios
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Chandra Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Marie Dolcini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Ann Zabat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Yukari Seki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Elizabeth Carey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Emily Ling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Ellen Gazen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Jessica Berg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Hurjane Vongsachang
published
Junko Bice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chandra Thomas + Noa Ramo-Larios3346% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Qingqing Zong
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.43
Noa Ramo-Larios
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Chandra Thomas
27W–14L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
Marie Dolcini
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
21%78%<1%
4.11
4
Ann Zabat
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.96
Yukari Seki
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.93
Elizabeth Carey
11W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.87
Emily Ling
42W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
Ellen Gazen
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Jessica Berg
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Hurjane Vongsachang
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Junko Bice
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.