Teams

Hit Happy/Van Slyke/Pleasanton

2024 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-26vs No Randos/Blaha/Los AltosWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeth Hostetler / Jill Van Slyke vs Shelly Wallace / Kyoko Hubbard4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoanna Broda-Schunck / Martha Matrisian vs Hsiao-Yun Yang / Ella Wu6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobin Hultgren / Lual Lualhati vs Sonia Whitfield / Erinn O'Reilly1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-10-26vs Minions/Vongsachang/Mountain ViewLost 03
L#1 DoublesRaquel Atkin / Kathleen Larragueta vs Chandra Thomas / Qingqing Zong0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAthena Lofquist / Joanna Broda-Schunck vs Ellen Gazen / Emily Ling3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLual Lualhati / Robin Hultgren vs Elizabeth Carey / Ann Zabat0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Martha Matrisian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Beth Hostetler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Flor Salinas
published
3.90
Athena Lofquist
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Kathleen Larragueta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Joanna Broda-Schunck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Jill Van Slyke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Raquel Atkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Lual Lualhati
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
3.39
Dana Baioni
published 3.5
Robin Hultgren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Hostetler + Kathleen Larragueta1439% gamesnot enough data
Joanna Broda-Schunck + Jill Van Slyke134 matchesnot enough data
Jill Van Slyke + Raquel Atkin123 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Larragueta + Raquel Atkin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Matrisian
22W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
Beth Hostetler
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Flor Salinas
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Athena Lofquist
26W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
Kathleen Larragueta
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.85
Joanna Broda-Schunck
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.81
Jill Van Slyke
7W–49L career · 1 line in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.79
Raquel Atkin
7W–24L career · 1 line in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.72
Lual Lualhati
28W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
Stephanie Chamberlin
21W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Dana Baioni
123W–127L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Robin Hultgren
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.