Teams

MEMPK ABELLO

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-31vs MEMPK GOLDSTEINWon 10
W#1 DoublesVincent Lopez / Gregory Smith vs Chad Houchin / Jason Nunnery6-1, 6-2
2022-05-24vs LTFCS VANDEVEERWon 10
W#1 DoublesVincent Lopez / Gregory Smith vs Roderick Coles / Greg Keirns6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-17vs GOG ENGELAGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesVincent Lopez / Gregory Smith vs Jason Carter / Trent Glaser7-5, 6-4
2022-05-10vs CCW MCCLELLANDWon 10
W#1 DoublesVincent Lopez / Gregory Smith vs Bruce Bugno / William Tostanoski6-4, 7-6
2022-04-26vs FLYHS GRAFSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVincent Lopez / Gregory Smith vs George Graf / Ryan Frost7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPhil Abello / Dale Passmore vs Anthony Park / John Swenson6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-19vs LTFCS ANEWALTLost 01
L#1 DoublesGregory Smith / Vincent Lopez vs David Clipsham / Erik Hansen2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Adam Pienciak
published 4
3.42
Gregory Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Vincent Lopez
published
Hugo Fontalvo
published 3.5
3.22
Dale Passmore
published 3.5
3.17
Greg Schochet
published 3.5
3.15
Phil Abello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.68
Lane Landrith
published
Geoffrey Rutecki
published
Joe Subialka
published
John Swarmer
published
Kirk Askinas
published
Roger Butts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Smith + Greg Schochet5356% games+1.6% vs expected
Gregory Smith + Vincent Lopez6351% games−3.7% vs expected
Gregory Smith + Phil Abello4259% gamesnot enough data
Hugo Fontalvo + Lane Landrith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Pienciak
19W–6L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Gregory Smith
80W–36L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Vincent Lopez
68W–32L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Hugo Fontalvo
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dale Passmore
21W–24L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Greg Schochet
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Phil Abello
37W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Lane Landrith
31W–49L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
Geoffrey Rutecki
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joe Subialka
0W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Swarmer
12W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kirk Askinas
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Roger Butts
30W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.