Teams

PRKR WHITE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-02vs CCV REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesWendy Eckert / Gelsey Azhderian vs Georgene Pedrie / Kelli Nesbitt6-4, 6-4
2024-08-26vs SS-LT BLUEWon 20
W#1 SinglesChristine Heimbuck vs Sara Haynes3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Mortenson / Gelsey Azhderian vs Carol Berg / Brooke Wolf6-1, 6-3
2024-08-24vs SS-LT GOLDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGelsey Azhderian / Stephanie Smith vs Sara Percival / Beth Reedy3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesChristine Heimbuck vs Sheila Marino2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-08-19vs PRC PURPLELost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Smith / Kristen Warnick vs Whitney Coakley / Joyce Clegg6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2024-08-12vs CPV BLUEWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristine Heimbuck vs JoAnn DelMonte6-0, 6-3
2024-07-29vs SH BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesGelsey Azhderian / Vicky M Martin vs Moonkyoung Kim / Bongsook Riewe6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-22vs RRTC PURPLELost 01
L#1 SinglesChristine Heimbuck vs Elizabeth Luce6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Christine Heimbuck
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Gelsey Azhderian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Erika Fox
published
2.75
Robin Mortenson
published
2.63
Wendy Eckert
published
2.56
Vicky M Martin
published
2.49
Kristen Warnick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Warnick + Erika Fox4256% games+15.7% vs expected
Robin Mortenson + Vicky M Martin3450% games−4.6% vs expected
Robin Mortenson + Wendy Eckert3740% games−10.4% vs expected
Kristen Warnick + Wendy Eckert033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Heimbuck
77W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3
Gelsey Azhderian
71W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
Erika Fox
22W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
Robin Mortenson
26W–34L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Wendy Eckert
11W–19L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.63
Vicky M Martin
13W–23L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Kristen Warnick
45W–56L career · 1 line in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.