Teams

WNCC Anders (ARC-Crowne)

Singles League 18 & Over NC WNC 2025 · 18+ Women 3.5 - Thursday PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-28vs WNCB Robinson (AP)Won 30
W#1 SinglesQuenton Wright vs Johanna Lopez6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKelly Gillis vs Becky Robinson6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAudrey Fortezzo vs Emily Richter6-0, 6-1
2025-08-14vs WNCP van Vonno (ARC-Crowne)Won 21
L#1 SinglesKarolina Drozdz vs Catherine Mitchell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesQuenton Wright vs Kylie Hopkins6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesCaroline Anders vs Patricia van Vonno6-0, 6-1
2025-08-07vs WNCM Goskowicz (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesKarolina Drozdz vs Christine Carson2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesQuenton Wright vs Shepard O'Connell6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAdriane Deeter vs Sybil Tate3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-29vs WNCE Schoen (CCA)Won 30
W#1 SinglesKelly Gillis vs Evie Tashie6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAudrey Fortezzo vs Dominika Tanianis6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKarolina Drozdz vs Jenifer Bolton6-1, 7-5
2025-07-24vs WNCM Silver (Aston Park)Won 30
W#1 SinglesKelly Gillis vs Violet Smith-Martin6-0, 7-6
W#2 SinglesAdriane Deeter vs Bethany Smith-Martin3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAudrey Fortezzo vs Mary Cooper6-2, 6-4
2025-07-09vs WNCL Harrell (BFCC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesKelly Gillis vs Caroline Perry6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAudrey Fortezzo vs Lydia Harrell6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesCaroline Anders vs Kirby Finger6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Women 3.5 - Thursday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Kelly Gillis
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.47
Adriane Deeter
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Audrey Fortezzo
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Caroline Anders
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Quenton Wright
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.27
Karolina Drozdz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Gillis + Quenton Wright11069% games+10.9% vs expected
Caroline Anders + Adriane Deeter224 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Anders + Audrey Fortezzo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Gillis
58W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.71
3.5
Adriane Deeter
26W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Audrey Fortezzo
27W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Caroline Anders
25W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Quenton Wright
23W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Karolina Drozdz
9W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.