Teams

WNCP van Vonno (ARC-Crowne)

Singles League 18 & Over NC WNC 2025 · 18+ Women 3.5 - Thursday PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-14vs WNCC Anders (ARC-Crowne)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesKylie Hopkins vs Quenton Wright2-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesPatricia van Vonno vs Caroline Anders0-6, 1-6
2025-08-07vs WNCM Silver (Aston Park)Split 11
W#2 SinglesHannah Singleton vs Mary Cooper6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJennifer German vs Colby Keefe3-6, 2-6
2025-07-24vs WNCL Harrell (BFCC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesMary-Marlowe Scott vs Caroline Perry0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnna Guthy vs Lydia Harrell6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJennifer German vs Kirby Finger4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-10vs WNCB Robinson (AP)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesKylie Hopkins vs Michelle Pugliese6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesPatricia van Vonno vs Meredith Love1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesAndra Smith vs Johanna Lopez4-6, 4-6
2025-06-26vs WNCE Schoen (CCA)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesAnna Guthy vs Elizabeth Schoen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesHallie Gray vs Jenifer Bolton6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Women 3.5 - Thursday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Anna Guthy
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Hannah Singleton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.12
Kylie Hopkins
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.88
Hallie Gray
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.87
Patricia van Vonno
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Andra Smith
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Jennifer German
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Mary-Marlowe Scott
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia van Vonno + Hannah Singleton134 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Singleton + Anna Guthy404 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Singleton + Kylie Hopkins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Guthy
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Hannah Singleton
25W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Kylie Hopkins
29W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Hallie Gray
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Patricia van Vonno
23W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Andra Smith
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer German
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary-Marlowe Scott
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.