Teams

Ortis/Brown-18/3.0/M/Pelican

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings7 teams · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Centanni/Abrams-18/3.0/M/STONE120491126339
2Ortis/Brown-18/3.0/M/Pelican93332764513
3Matherne-18/3.0/M/N. Cypress84362453471
4Guma/18/3.0/M/BCCC66352559481
5Miller-18/3.0/M/Francos57283269538
6Gillane/18/3.0/M/STONE111194187602
7Graybill/18/3.0/M/TCCC1111050103667

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
JP Love
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
Chandler Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.71
Evan Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
Jason Catt
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Jason Landry
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Jason Ortis
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Joseph Kanode
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kurt Kopanke
usually #1 Singles 37%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Landon Brown
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Luis Jonathan Perez
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
Mark Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
R Timothy Brown
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Ross Goodlett
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sean McMullen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Travis Motichek
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JP Love + Travis Motichek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
JP Love
16W–10L career · 17 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Chandler Edwards
2W–9L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Evan Bailey
10W–11L career · 17 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Jason Catt
38W–17L career · 34 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Landry
7W–15L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Ortis
16W–34L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Kanode
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kurt Kopanke
5W–18L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Landon Brown
10W–13L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luis Jonathan Perez
6W–12L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Lucas
17W–12L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
R Timothy Brown
20W–33L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ross Goodlett
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sean McMullen
7W–6L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Motichek
17W–29L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.