Teams

Fuller/Shokes/CCC/Foothills

2024 Foothills Combo Doubles - 40 & over · 5.5 Combo Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-09vs Moore/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSondra Simmons / Linda Corcoran vs Kathy Collins / Marianna Geyer6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Lever / Carolyn Carlile vs Emily Garmon / Laura Barrett2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-02vs Garnett/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Shokes / Carolyn Carlile vs Brandon Bray / Mollyrose Wright5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-18vs Moore/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSondra Simmons / Linda Corcoran vs Lisa Moore / Hilary May6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShannon Fuller / Carolyn Carlile vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-11vs Garnett/LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSondra Simmons / Linda Corcoran vs Kristine Hutton / Brandon Bray0-6, 1-6
2024-08-28vs Moore/HCP/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSondra Simmons / Linda Corcoran vs Lisa Moore / Hilary May6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLiza Dellinger / Carolyn Carlile vs Emily Garmon / Zenaida Camacho2-6, 4-6
2024-08-21vs Garnett/LHCC/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Shokes / Beth Bechtold vs Ashley Stahlschmidt / Linda Schultz6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShannon Fuller / Carolyn Carlile vs Angie Aycock / Heather Mills6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Karen Shokes
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Sondra Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.67
Maria Sherrill
published
2.66
Olivia Good
published
2.56
Linda Corcoran
published
2.48
Beth Bechtold
published 3
2.42
Carolyn Carlile
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.27
Laura Lever
published
Liza Dellinger
published
Rhonda Laxton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Lever + Beth Bechtold5169% games+16.0% vs expected
Karen Shokes + Sondra Simmons1536% gamesnot enough data
Sondra Simmons + Carolyn Carlile2444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karen Shokes
176W–86L career · 8 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Sondra Simmons
157W–103L career · 10 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Maria Sherrill
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
2.67
Olivia Good
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
Linda Corcoran
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Beth Bechtold
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Carolyn Carlile
51W–81L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%72%28%
2.42
Laura Lever
14W–24L career · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.27
Liza Dellinger
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rhonda Laxton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.