← Search

Sondra Simmons

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hickory, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
298 matches · 180W–118L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history298 matches
L
2026-10-21 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carissa Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-06 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarita Black
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-05 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Austin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-01 · Shokes/Fuller/CCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Corcoran
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-30 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mindy Murray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-24 · Shokes/Fuller/CCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Corcoran
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-22 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carissa Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-17 · Shokes/Fuller/CCC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Bechtold
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-16 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Austin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-15 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carissa Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-09 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Shokes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-08 · Abernathy-Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Samantha Austin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 56.9% of games
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
70.9%
83W–34L · 60% of games
3.5
52.8%
38W–34L · 49.3% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
66.7%
16W–8L · 55% of games
6.5
52.9%
27W–24L · 51.7% of games
7.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 34.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
152 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
50 matches
#1 Singles
4%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert