← Search

Lydia Sanders

— year-end
54 matches · 32W–22L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Lydia Sanders to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-02 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with DeAnna Finger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shanda Hedrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chloee Dula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Chesney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-08-18 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Isbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-11 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jodi Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · Drop Shot Divas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maile Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maile Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 65.2% of games
3.5
60.7%
17W–11L · 53.1% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.7% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 54.1% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King