← Search

Tisha Zagaroli

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hickory, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
249 matches · 154W–95L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history249 matches
L
2026-10-21 · Skoog/LHCC/FHills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Deal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-14 · Skoog/LHCC/FHills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rhonda Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-05 · Morin/Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blair Tate
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-09-30 · Skoog/LHCC/FHills · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Coley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-29 · Barefoot/Blair/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Blair
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-09-11 · Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlie Zagaroli mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-10 · Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Harris mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-10 · Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Harris mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-01 · Barefoot/Blair/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristine Hutton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · Morin/Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blair Tate
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-26 · Skoog/LHCC/FHills · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Deal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · Barefoot/Blair/LHCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Blair
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.2% of games
2.5
65%
13W–7L · 57.1% of games
3.0
73.2%
52W–19L · 59.5% of games
3.5
62.1%
59W–36L · 56.6% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 34.8% of games
5.0
25%
1W–3L · 43.6% of games
5.5
40%
4W–6L · 49.5% of games
6.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 49.8% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.2% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
121 matches
#1 Singles
17%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
25 matches
#2 Singles
7%
17 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer