← Search

Chloee Dula

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lenoir, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 77W–73L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history150 matches
L
Lydia Sanders / Chloee Blochaviak
2026-10-13 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
Chloee Blochaviak / Emily Cunningham
2026-10-12 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Emily Spillman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
Lydia Sanders / Chloee Blochaviak
2026-10-06 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Walker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-10-03 · #3 Singles · 3.0 · with Chloee Blochaviak championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
Chloee Blochaviak
2026-10-02 · #3 Singles · 3.0 · with Meredith Penn championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Chloee Blochaviak
2026-10-02 · #2 Singles · 3.0 · with Deana Georgitis championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-10-01 · #2 Singles · 3.0 · with Chloee Blochaviak championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
Chloee Blochaviak
2026-10-01 · #1 Singles · 3.0 · with Rachel Wright Junio championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
Sierra Caudle / Chloee Blochaviak
2026-09-28 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Everley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Amy Moore / Chloee Blochaviak
2026-09-22 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathy Collins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
Cami Robertson / Chloee Blochaviak
2026-09-21 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Beane
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-09-15 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chloee Blochaviak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
69.2%
18W–8L · 60.3% of games
2.5
0%
0W–4L · 35.9% of games
3.0
55.2%
37W–30L · 53% of games
3.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.4% of games
5.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 49.5% of games
6.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
19 matches
#2 Singles
9%
13 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams