Teams

BAY CLUB PL 40MX8.0B

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX8.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRia Mendoza / Peng Qu vs Jennifer Do / Neeraj Sharma1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-21vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 40MX8.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesRia Mendoza / Dai Truong vs Thuy Nguyen / Paul Hendrickson6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Lisa Oktavia
published
4.29
Paul Liu
published
4.25
Jaime Santos
published 4.5
4.12
Tina Baykaner
published
3.94
Leslie Matsumura
published
3.87
Ryan Low
published
3.87
Wade Conklin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Dai Truong
published 4
3.84
Angela Lemke
published 4
3.82
Laurie Radanovich
published
3.81
Ming Ta
published
3.81
Alexander Tain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Maggie Yuen
published
3.75
Christine Choye
published 4
3.63
Paul Kwon
published
3.63
Ted Chen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Peng Qu
published
3.50
Ria Mendoza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Hui Xie
published 3.5
3.27
Alma Hwang
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alma Hwang + Ming Ta3261% gamesnot enough data
Jaime Santos + Lisa Oktavia314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Oktavia
41W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
4.36
Paul Liu
27W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Jaime Santos
23W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
Tina Baykaner
24W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
Leslie Matsumura
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Ryan Low
59W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
Wade Conklin
19W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Dai Truong
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Angela Lemke
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.84
Laurie Radanovich
44W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Ming Ta
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Alexander Tain
19W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Maggie Yuen
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Christine Choye
21W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Paul Kwon
23W–15L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
Ted Chen
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.63
Peng Qu
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Ria Mendoza
72W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Hui Xie
22W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Alma Hwang
3W–6L career · type M · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.