Teams

Center Court Cardinals//ECC

2022 OKCAdult 55 & Over League · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-19vs passed/Davis/55&over7.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesTim Bostick / Michael Calhoun vs Paul Mullasseril / Kirk Purnell7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Cox / William Puffinbarger vs Ken Coffey / Tony Pound4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJames Rainey / Michael Wiens vs Patrick Doughty / Michael Thagard6-4, 6-4
2022-05-17vs CantrellWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Calhoun / Carl Lindquist vs Mac Lazarus / Roger Lienke2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Wheatley / John Cox vs Jaime Maddox / Ernesto Lang4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Rainey / Michael Wiens vs Leroy Cantrell / Gary Bryant2-6, 4-6
2022-05-12vs Cruz//EWWon 21
W#1 DoublesTim Bostick / Michael Calhoun vs Daniel Perreira / Scott Poss6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Wheatley / John Cox vs Thanh Le / Marc Lugrand7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJames Rainey / Michael Wiens vs Noe Cruz / Christopher Mattingly2-6, 4-6
2022-04-28vs passed/Davis/55&over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Calhoun / Michael Wiens vs RICHARD DAVIS / Robert Fleming3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTim Bostick / John Mark Aylor vs Patrick Doughty / Fred Lueck4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarl Lindquist / James Rainey vs Kirk Purnell / Kevin Carter4-6, 3-6
2022-04-21vs Cruz//EWWon 21
L#1 DoublesTim Bostick / William Puffinbarger vs Thanh Le / Marc Lugrand1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Wiens / Michael Calhoun vs Christopher Mattingly / Conrad Charalampous6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Rainey / Carl Lindquist vs Eric Nazim / David Dillard3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-14vs CantrellWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Wheatley / John Mark Aylor vs Will Allen / Nes Pinaroc6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWilliam Puffinbarger / Tim Bostick vs Dave Rankin / Jaime Maddox0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCarl Lindquist / James Rainey vs Mark Maxted / Mac Lazarus3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-07vs passed/Davis/55&over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Mark Aylor / Matthew Wheatley vs Kelly Bishop / Mark Shuck3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTim Bostick / Michael Wiens vs Patrick Doughty / Fred Lueck0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Puffinbarger / James Rainey vs Kevin Carter / Ken Coffey1-6, 2-6
2022-03-31vs Cruz//EWLost 03
L#1 DoublesTim Bostick / Michael Wiens vs Daniel Perreira / Thanh Le6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Rainey / Steven Kinney vs Scott Poss / Conrad Charalampous1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarl Lindquist / William Puffinbarger vs David Dillard / Eric Nazim2-6, 4-6
2022-03-24vs CantrellLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Wheatley / John Mark Aylor vs Ernesto Lang / Terrence Morgan6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichael Wiens / Tim Bostick vs Mike Sarsycki / Mac Lazarus5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarl Lindquist / Steven Kinney vs Leroy Cantrell / Gary Bryant0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
James Rainey
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.10
Tim Bostick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
John Mark Aylor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Carl Lindquist
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.83
Michael Calhoun
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
John Cox
published
Matthew Wheatley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Michael Wiens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Steven Kinney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
William Puffinbarger
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Bostick + Michael Calhoun141054% games+2.2% vs expected
Carl Lindquist + James Rainey5548% games+1.1% vs expected
Tim Bostick + Michael Wiens1539% games−12.7% vs expected
Matthew Wheatley + John Mark Aylor4352% gamesnot enough data
Michael Calhoun + Michael Wiens2543% gamesnot enough data
Tim Bostick + James Rainey2346% gamesnot enough data
Tim Bostick + William Puffinbarger044 matchesnot enough data
James Rainey + Michael Wiens134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
James Rainey
44W–96L career · 8 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Tim Bostick
68W–66L career · 8 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
John Mark Aylor
45W–57L career · 4 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Carl Lindquist
47W–160L career · 6 lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.88
Michael Calhoun
57W–98L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
John Cox
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Wheatley
63W–98L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Wiens
35W–50L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Kinney
5W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Puffinbarger
14W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.