Teams

Cruz//EW

2022 OKCAdult 55 & Over League · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-19vs CantrellWon 21
W#1 DoublesThanh Le / Eric Nazim vs Roger Lienke / Dave Rankin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Perreira / Conrad Charalampous vs Jaime Maddox / Mark Maxted6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNoe Cruz / David Dillard vs Will Allen / Marden Winkler4-6, 2-6
2022-05-17vs passed/Davis/55&over7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesThanh Le / Conrad Charalampous vs Michael Thagard / Patrick Doughty1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNoe Cruz / David Dillard vs Kevin Carter / Tony Pound5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEric Nazim / Scott Poss vs Ken Coffey / RICHARD DAVIS2-6, 2-6
2022-05-12vs Center Court Cardinals//ECCLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Perreira / Scott Poss vs Tim Bostick / Michael Calhoun1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesThanh Le / Marc Lugrand vs Matthew Wheatley / John Cox5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNoe Cruz / Christopher Mattingly vs James Rainey / Michael Wiens6-2, 6-4
2022-04-28vs CantrellWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarc Lugrand / Conrad Charalampous vs Dave Rankin / Ernesto Lang7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNoe Cruz / Thanh Le vs Leroy Cantrell / Nes Pinaroc6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEric Nazim / David Dillard vs Will Allen / Marden Winkler6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-21vs Center Court Cardinals//ECCLost 12
W#1 DoublesThanh Le / Marc Lugrand vs Tim Bostick / William Puffinbarger6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristopher Mattingly / Conrad Charalampous vs Michael Wiens / Michael Calhoun4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEric Nazim / David Dillard vs James Rainey / Carl Lindquist6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-14vs passed/Davis/55&over7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesThanh Le / Marc Lugrand vs Greg Morrison / Mark Shuck6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEric Nazim / Scott Poss vs Kelly Bishop / RICHARD DAVIS6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Dillard / Christopher Mattingly vs Paul Mullasseril / Robert Fleming7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-07vs CantrellLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Perreira / Christopher Mattingly vs Jaime Maddox / Dave Rankin2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNoe Cruz / Thanh Le vs Gary Bryant / Leroy Cantrell7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Dillard / Conrad Charalampous vs Terrence Morgan / Roger Lienke2-6, 2-6
2022-03-31vs Center Court Cardinals//ECCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Perreira / Thanh Le vs Tim Bostick / Michael Wiens3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Poss / Conrad Charalampous vs James Rainey / Steven Kinney6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Dillard / Eric Nazim vs Carl Lindquist / William Puffinbarger6-2, 6-4
2022-03-24vs passed/Davis/55&over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesThanh Le / Daniel Perreira vs Greg Morrison / Mark Shuck2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Dillard / Eric Nazim vs Fred Lueck / Patrick Doughty1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesConrad Charalampous / Noe Cruz vs Robert Fleming / Kirk Purnell4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Conrad Charalampous
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.25
Eric Nazim
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.99
Scott Poss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Christopher Mattingly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Daniel Perreira
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
David Dillard
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Marc Lugrand
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Noe Cruz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Thanh Le
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Nazim + Scott Poss3946% games+1.7% vs expected
David Dillard + Eric Nazim224 matchesnot enough data
Eric Nazim + Daniel Perreira123 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Mattingly + Conrad Charalampous123 matchesnot enough data
Thanh Le + Marc Lugrand213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Conrad Charalampous
5W–6L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Eric Nazim
101W–141L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Scott Poss
19W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Christopher Mattingly
37W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Daniel Perreira
48W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
David Dillard
2W–6L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marc Lugrand
25W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Noe Cruz
40W–47L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thanh Le
13W–10L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.