Teams

Team 9 Net Dancers

2024 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-12vs Team 1 NOVA CrushLost 02
L#1 DoublesQun Bi / Yang Michelle Su vs Elizabeth Solander / Whitney Slahetka2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMenglun Qin / Yuqing Xiong vs Susan Velasco / Nancy Sicairos3-6, 4-6
2024-09-07vs Team 1 Wasabi PeasWon 10
W#2 DoublesYuqing Xiong / Menglun Qin vs KATERYNA SAVCHYN / Monica Palacios6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-09-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesQun Bi / XIAOZHEN LIN vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-03vs Team 6 Elsheikh- Belle HavenLost 01
L#2 DoublesQun Bi / Yuqing Xiong vs Gibson McMahon / Claire Lewis3-6, 4-6
2024-08-29vs NOVA - DeVitoLost 01
L#2 DoublesQun Bi / Tana Jankowiak vs Karyn DeVito / Marguerite McFadden6-7, 3-4
2024-08-09vs Team 2 Tri & Catch UsLost 01
L#2 DoublesTana Jankowiak / Menglun Qin vs Joan-Marie Turchiano / Jeri Borsi4-6, 3-4
2024-08-04vs Team 7 JonesLost 01
L#2 DoublesMenglun Qin / Li Ives vs Sibyll Jones / Colleen Peacher6-7, 2-2
2024-08-02vs Team 8 TrifectaLost 01
L#1 DoublesQun Bi / Menglun Qin vs Galina Orlova / Denise Weinig4-6, 3-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Yang Michelle Su
published
3.73
Shan Wang
published
3.63
Tana Jankowiak
published 4
3.52
Menglun Qin
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.52
Qun Bi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.47
Yuqing Xiong
published
3.46
Liqing Zhang
published
3.31
TingTing Du
published
3.23
Xuan Du
published
3.12
Li Ives
published
3.11
Lihang Ren
published
3.08
Na Yu
published
2.96
Yi Su
published
2.94
Kai Yu
published
2.52
Lemin Xiao
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yang Michelle Su
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Shan Wang
31W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Tana Jankowiak
96W–69L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Menglun Qin
50W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Qun Bi
74W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Yuqing Xiong
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.47
Liqing Zhang
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
3.46
TingTing Du
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Xuan Du
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Li Ives
12W–34L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
Lihang Ren
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
Na Yu
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Yi Su
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.96
Kai Yu
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
Lemin Xiao
16W–28L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.