OC- Tennis Lovers - LPC - Diekneit

2022 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule5 played

2022-02-12vs OC LPC - MakLost 0–1

L#3 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Martin Foigelman vs David Mak / Vivian Kang7-5, 3-6, 0-1

2022-02-05vs OC - LPC Herb TanLost 0–1

L#3 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Martin Foigelman vs Annette Christie / Leonel Ruiz Rios6-4, 1-6, 0-1

2022-01-29vs OC LLW Boot Camp - FVTC - FrankWon 1–0

W#2 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Martin Foigelman vs Alicia Villarino / Bruce Phung6-7, 0-1

2022-01-23vs OC - Coto De Caza - CostelloLost 0–1

L#3 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Brian Jaffe vs Andrea Kozak / Perry Valaskantjis3-6, 0-6

2022-01-16vs OC - Solid Gold- CMTC TonyLost 0–1

L#2 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Ken Meyer vs Tony Huynh / Liz Rapoza7-5, 1-6, 0-1

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15

Calvin Lam

published 4.5

3.70

Julie Le

published —

3.30

Sharon Diekneit

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5

2.98

Diann Burns

published 3.5

2.86

Brian Jaffe

published 3.5

—

Ken Meyer

published —

—

Martin Foigelman

published —

—

Sheri Hall

published —

—

Wesley Hall

published —

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5

Calvin Lam

9W–1L career · no lines in 2022

12%88%<1%

4.15

—

Julie Le

5W–13L career · no lines in 2022

7%92%1%

3.70

3.5

Sharon Diekneit

186W–204L career · 5 lines in 2022

1%93%6%

3.30

3.5

Diann Burns

1W–3L career · no lines in 2022

56%44%<1%

2.98

3.5

Brian Jaffe

4W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2022

86%14%<1%

2.86

—

Ken Meyer

1W–2L career · no lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Martin Foigelman

0W–3L career · no lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Sheri Hall

3W–1L career · no lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Wesley Hall

2W–0L career · no lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.