Teams

DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AW6.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 6.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-23vs BAY TREES PK 55AW6.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesFedwa Booth / Elise D Harvey vs Linda Duchscherer / Stephanie Wendell3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElise D Harvey / Traci Rebiejo vs Kelly Anderson / Marilyn Scully6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-28vs CROW CANYON CC 55AW6.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Weiss / Elise D Harvey vs Jackelyne Ferreira / Donna Sbarra6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Cindy Turner
published 3.5
3.34
Belinda Castillo
published 3.5
3.11
Michelle Weiss
published
2.98
Florita Labrador
published
2.97
Diana Rosdahl
published 3
2.95
Elise D Harvey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Olga Keselman
published
2.89
Fedwa Booth
published
2.85
Traci Rebiejo
published
2.85
2.65
Ellen Zapalac
published
2.52
Elaine Marshall
published
2.23
Heather Mehta
published
Julie Garrahan
published
Suzanne Garrett
published
Verena Zacharias
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Florita Labrador + Elise D Harvey5354% games+0.3% vs expected
Olga Keselman + Ellen Zapalac404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Turner
20W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Belinda Castillo
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Michelle Weiss
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Florita Labrador
70W–72L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Diana Rosdahl
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.97
Elise D Harvey
71W–78L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Olga Keselman
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Fedwa Booth
12W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Traci Rebiejo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Christina Cordoza
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Ellen Zapalac
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.65
Elaine Marshall
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Heather Mehta
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Julie Garrahan
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Garrett
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Verena Zacharias
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.