Teams

Roley 7.0 Mixed 40+ Tues

2023 Piedmont Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40+ Tues PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-11vs Tapler/OFRC 7.0 Mixed 40+ TuesWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Wallace / Scott Wallace vs Chad Davis / Katie Bir6-2, 6-4
2023-06-29vs Kirby 7.0 Mixed 40+ TuesLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarian Hogan / Pat Hogan vs Trisha Kirby / Peter Meroth1-6, 5-7
2023-06-27vs Flanagan 7.0 Mixed 40+ TuesLost 01
L#2 DoublesPat Hogan / Marian Hogan vs Emily Wilson / Ashley Fuquay6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-23vs VANNAVONG 7.0 Mixed 40+ TuesLost 01
L#3 DoublesPat Hogan / Marian Hogan vs Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan / Kelly Pryzwansky2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40+ Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Marian Hogan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Kevin Roley
published
3.46
Scott Wallace
published
3.31
Kenton Kreager
published
3.22
Tom Barringer
published
3.20
Craig Wasserman
published 3.5
3.13
Carrie Tauber
published 3.5
3.09
Page Kreager
published
3.05
Jeff Ingle
published
2.97
Pat Hogan
published
2.94
Shannon Roley
published
2.92
Laura Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Wendy Ingle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Roley + Shannon Roley4254% games−2.4% vs expected
Wendy Ingle + Jeff Ingle2537% games−10.4% vs expected
Page Kreager + Kenton Kreager1538% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Tauber + Tom Barringer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marian Hogan
128W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.61
Kevin Roley
40W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Scott Wallace
15W–34L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
Kenton Kreager
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Tom Barringer
15W–22L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Craig Wasserman
19W–25L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Carrie Tauber
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Page Kreager
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.09
Jeff Ingle
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Pat Hogan
18W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Shannon Roley
13W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.94
Laura Wallace
47W–73L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.92
Wendy Ingle
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.