Teams

Sorrow

2026 NOGTA Southern Combo 40 & Over- Summer · Women 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-24vs LoveladyWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Tuttle / Kate Rolen vs April Chambers / Wendy Norfleet7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAshley Sorrow / Janet Lawrence vs Kay Henderson / Cynthia Guest6-2, 6-1
2026-08-17vs YoungLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeather Tuttle / Mary Miller vs Diane Hardin / Lucynda Cynda Holmes6-4, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Decosimo / Kelley Finnell vs Nelu Farren / Dominique Muhlada1-6, 1-6
2026-08-03vs LoveladyLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnita Decosimo / Janet Lawrence vs Jessica Carter / Kay Henderson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBetty Andersen / Cielene Aleksejus vs Katie Sanders / Connie Corbin4-6, 4-6
2026-07-27vs YoungLost 12
L#1 DoublesJana Henson / Heather Tuttle vs Phuong Le / Nelu Farren3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Sorrow / Janet Lawrence vs Diane Hardin / Lucynda Cynda Holmes2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCourtney Andreach / Kate Rolen vs Anthea Young / Kari Martin6-3, 6-1
2026-07-24vs LoveladyLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Sorrow / Kelley Finnell vs Jessica Carter / Kay Henderson4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLeslie Simmons / Cielene Aleksejus vs Katie Sanders / Connie Corbin3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAnita Decosimo / Jana Henson vs Raquel Riesco / Janet Lovelady3-0
2026-07-06vs YoungLost 03
L#1 DoublesCourtney Andreach / Kelley Finnell vs Nelu Farren / Phuong Le2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Simmons / Jana Henson vs Sandra Sadler / Dominique Muhlada0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Tuttle / Janet Lawrence vs Carol Tigar / Andrea Watson4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lovelady236918140
2Sorrow0531224148

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Courtney Andreach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Heather Tuttle
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Betty Andersen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Anita Decosimo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Ashley Sorrow
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Cielene Aleksejus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Janet Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Jana Henson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Kelley Finnell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kate Rolen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betty Andersen + Heather Tuttle303 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Sorrow + Cielene Aleksejus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Courtney Andreach
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
Heather Tuttle
35W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
3.5
Betty Andersen
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Anita Decosimo
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Ashley Sorrow
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Cielene Aleksejus
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Janet Lawrence
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jana Henson
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.87
Kelley Finnell
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Kate Rolen
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.