Teams

HTP

2021 18&Over Mixed · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-04-11vs MSU: Nassau - AndersonLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Fiske / Mohan Duggi vs Colton van Mol / Elise Gerdes4-6, 3-6
2021-03-28vs Hot Mix 8.0 EastWon 10
W#2 DoublesMohan Duggi / Laura Fiske vs JANET van MOL / Lloyd Pearson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-02-19vs NJ: NassauWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Chung / Wazim Khan vs Colton van Mol / Izumi Harris7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMeng Zhang / Sam Doctor vs Alan Howard / Allison Bloch6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Hodge / Margaret Hodge vs Linh Fruge / Mark Krowiak3-6, 1-6
2021-02-12vs NJ: NassauLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Jacobus / Barbara Jacobus vs Chanaka Amarasinghe / Lindsey Amarhanow2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHarold Stern / Bonnie Lidz vs Daniel Hudec / Regan Shafer2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMichael Hodge / Margaret Hodge vs Olga Carey / Jigar Shah3-6, 4-6
2021-02-05vs NJ: NassauLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Chung / Wazim Khan vs Dan Khoo / Elme Schmid6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara Jacobus / Jeffrey Jacobus vs Daniel Hudec / Regan Shafer2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Hodge / Margaret Hodge vs Tyler Harris / JANET van MOL0-6, 0-6
2021-01-29vs NJ: NassauWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Fiske / Sam Doctor vs Colton van Mol / Olga Carey6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Chung / Wazim Khan vs John Kudrle / Maureen Ruckelshaus4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMargaret Hodge / Michael Hodge vs Mark Krowiak / Linh Fruge6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-01-22vs NJ: NassauLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Jacobus / Barbara Jacobus vs Lindsey Amarhanow / Chanaka Amarasinghe0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Hodge / Margaret Hodge vs John Kudrle / Brigette Elaina Brooks2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHazel-Ann Rodney / Wazim Khan vs Jigar Shah / Allison Bloch6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-01-15vs NJ: NassauWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Fiske / Marc Faber vs Tyler Harris / Izumi Harris6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCecilia Orchard / Sam Doctor vs Colton van Mol / Maureen Ruckelshaus7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHarold Stern / Bonnie Lidz vs Egbert Baldovino / Kristina Baldovino5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2021-01-08vs NJ: NassauLost 02
L#1 DoublesHazel-Ann Rodney / Wazim Khan vs Dan Khoo / Elme Schmid7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHarold Stern / Bonnie Lidz vs Tyler Harris / JANET van MOL4-6, 1-6
2020-11-20vs NJ: NassauLost 12
L#1 DoublesSam Doctor / Meng Zhang vs Chanaka Amarasinghe / Lindsey Amarhanow6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHazel-Ann Rodney / Wazim Khan vs Kristina Baldovino / Egbert Baldovino6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Hodge / Margaret Hodge vs Alan Howard / Allison Bloch6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Laura Fiske
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Harold Stern
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Cecilia Orchard
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Michelle Chung
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.10
Hazel-Ann Rodney
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Barbara Jacobus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Margaret Hodge
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Meng Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Wazim Khan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wazim Khan + Michelle Chung4552% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Orchard + Harold Stern5359% gamesnot enough data
Wazim Khan + Hazel-Ann Rodney5256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Laura Fiske
121W–91L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
3.5
Harold Stern
67W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Cecilia Orchard
198W–81L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
Michelle Chung
41W–27L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Hazel-Ann Rodney
116W–99L career · 7 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Barbara Jacobus
8W–21L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Margaret Hodge
6W–15L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Meng Zhang
18W–29L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Wazim Khan
11W–9L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.