Teams

Ro.Elliott40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-06vs Ma.Wood40CWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Stradling / Lincoln Larson vs Jeff Keisner / Ian Villanueva6-1, 6-1
2024-09-19vs Ga.Fye40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesPreston Waldo / Casey Smith vs John van Campen / Britton Williams6-2, 6-1
2024-09-12vs Ph.Gugliotta40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesRichard Stradling / Lincoln Larson vs Graham Wright / Scott Walton6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-09-05vs Br.McLean40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesSean Krause / Casey Smith vs Kevin Hampton / Geoff Fuller6-2, 7-5
2024-08-29vs Ed.King40CWon 20
W#2 DoublesRichard Stradling / Lincoln Larson vs Charles Ashby / William Santa Rosa6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPreston Waldo / Casey Smith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-15vs Ev.Fultz40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesTucker King / David Coman vs Lance Williams / Jeffrey Pollack6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Preston Waldo
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 4
3.52
Tucker King
published
3.43
Howard Critcher
published
3.39
Casey Smith
published 3.5
3.37
Matthew Pare
published
3.32
Sean Krause
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Timothy Franklin
published
3.18
Richard Stradling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Scott Lundy
published
3.15
Lincoln Larson
published
3.11
David Coman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Ronald Elliott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Coman + Matthew Pare3352% games+1.0% vs expected
Sean Krause + Richard Stradling224 matchesnot enough data
Richard Stradling + David Coman123 matchesnot enough data
Ronald Elliott + Scott Lundy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Preston Waldo
145W–52L career · 11 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Tucker King
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Howard Critcher
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Casey Smith
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Matthew Pare
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Sean Krause
58W–50L career · 1 line in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Timothy Franklin
23W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.21
Richard Stradling
49W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Scott Lundy
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.17
Lincoln Larson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3
David Coman
87W–47L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
Ronald Elliott
20W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.