Teams

LCTA40/Balcer/MPR

USTA 40 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Holly Balcer
published 4
3.67
Matt MacKelcan
published
3.59
Lori Cameron
published
3.38
Susan Cutter
published
3.38
Michael Lavoie
published
3.37
Geraldine Scott
published 3.5
3.26
Suzie Smith
published
3.25
Beth Hasty
published 3.5
3.21
Daniel Galt
published 3.5
3.17
Pierre Leblanc
published
3.15
Elizabeth Cantey
published 3.5
3.14
Cacky Rivers
published 3.5
2.88
Mike Compton
published
2.76
Matt Marshall
published
Jason Haney
published
Sean Houseal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzie Smith + Pierre Leblanc2442% games−0.6% vs expected
Suzie Smith + Michael Lavoie224 matchesnot enough data
Cacky Rivers + Pierre Leblanc123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Holly Balcer
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
Matt MacKelcan
69W–59L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Lori Cameron
18W–28L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.59
Susan Cutter
44W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Michael Lavoie
45W–91L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Geraldine Scott
70W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.37
Suzie Smith
79W–147L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Beth Hasty
30W–24L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Daniel Galt
38W–49L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Pierre Leblanc
38W–101L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Elizabeth Cantey
24W–40L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Cacky Rivers
36W–23L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
Mike Compton
43W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
Matt Marshall
81W–79L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
Jason Haney
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sean Houseal
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.