Teams

Phelps 18s 3.5W Mon PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-12vs Goy/Georgevich 18s 3.5W Mon PMLost 04
L#1 DoublesKylie Kayser / Emily Mack vs Chetana Honnarayanahalli / Kimberly Halsey4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesStephanie Renn vs Crystal Mercado4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Brodeur / Deborah Ross vs Paula Gebhard / Kimberly Lancaster1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAllison Spooner vs Alina Vannavong0-6, 0-6
2025-04-21vs Ustach/Emmendorfer 18s 3.5W Mon PMSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKylie Kayser / Emily Mack vs Casey Emmendorfer / AMANDA ELDER7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlexa Smith vs Margaret Arnett6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSarah Vess / Stephanie Renn vs Ginger Ballard / Caitlin Brooks6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGayle Taylordean / Julia Brodeur vs Michele Matthews / Kelly Pryzwansky2-6, 3-6
2025-03-24vs Goy/Georgevich 18s 3.5W Mon PMLost 14
W#1 DoublesKylie Kayser / Emily Mack vs Chetana Honnarayanahalli / Melissa Gujrati7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAlexa Smith vs Crystal Mercado2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Spooner / Yvonne McConachie vs Courtney Jones / Kimberly Franz7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesGraceanne Schuster vs Jamie Cunningham0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGayle Taylordean / Sarah Vess vs Kimberly Halsey / Paula Gebhard4-6, 2-6
2025-03-17vs Tyler/Dagger 18s 3.5W Mon PMLost 23
L#1 DoublesRachel Mohorn / Alexa Smith vs Mary Winstead / Sloane McPeak5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Mack vs Sarah Schott6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Vess / Yvonne McConachie vs Meghan Hilleboe / Meredyth Long4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKylie Kayser vs Amy Geer7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJill Phelps / Deborah Ross vs Janet Howard / Rosa Phillips0-6, 0-6
2025-03-03vs Ustach/Emmendorfer 18s 3.5W Mon PMLost 14
W#1 DoublesEmily Mack / Kylie Kayser vs Casey Emmendorfer / Kelly Pryzwansky7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesStephanie Renn vs AMANDA ELDER1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Spooner / Yvonne McConachie vs Kelly Glick / Margaret Arnett3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAlexa Smith vs Michele Matthews2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGraceanne Schuster / Susan Shughart vs Caroline Yates / Ginger Ballard0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Emily Mack
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.17
Alexa Smith
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
3.17
Stephanie Renn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Yvonne McConachie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Kylie Kayser
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.11
Allison Spooner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Sarah Vess
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Catherine Martin
published 3
2.89
Julia Brodeur
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Gayle Taylordean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Jill Phelps
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Deborah Ross
published 3
2.54
Susan Shughart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Graceanne Schuster
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rachel Mohorn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Spooner + Susan Shughart224 matchesnot enough data
Emily Mack + Kylie Kayser314 matchesnot enough data
Allison Spooner + Yvonne McConachie033 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Renn + Gayle Taylordean123 matchesnot enough data
Graceanne Schuster + Susan Shughart033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Mack
26W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
3
Alexa Smith
30W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Stephanie Renn
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Yvonne McConachie
15W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Kylie Kayser
12W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Allison Spooner
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sarah Vess
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Catherine Martin
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
Julia Brodeur
0W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89
Gayle Taylordean
10W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Jill Phelps
2W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.68
3
Deborah Ross
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Susan Shughart
11W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
Graceanne Schuster
5W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Mohorn
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.