← Search

Sarah Vess

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oak Ridge, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 69W–66L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history135 matches
W
2026-04-20 · Phelps 18s 3.5W Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Shughart
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · Phelps 18s 3.5W Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Spooner
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-06 · Phelps 18s 3.5W Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvonne McConachie
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-10-15 · Phelps 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Graceanne Schuster
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-01 · Phelps 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Graceanne Schuster
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-03 · Phelps 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gayle Taylordean
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-08-27 · Phelps 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kik Poon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-08 · Goodman/Early 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ariane Cox
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-06-17 · Goodman/Early 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Feaster
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-10 · Goodman/Early 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bobbie Westrick
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-03 · Goodman/Early 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Feaster
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-04-21 · Phelps 18s 3.5W Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Renn
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75%
24W–8L · 63.3% of games
3.5
37.7%
20W–33L · 47% of games
5.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 62.7% of games
6.5
40.7%
11W–16L · 46.8% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
30 matches
#1 Singles
20%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
25 matches
#2 Singles
10%
14 matches
#3 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova