Teams

CDTA E 40&O W3.5 River Trails Hanrahan Sat 5 $22

CDTA ESL 40 & Over · CDTA ESL 40&O W 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.44 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-03vs CDTA E 40&O W3.5 Tam Lund Sat 1 $22Split 22
L#1 DoublesMeredith Santucci / Michele Canar vs Vina Maniquis / Agnieszka Fijol7-6, 2-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTheresa Whittington vs Alja Hessami-Maas0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBARBARA SCHWAB / Meghan Kostyk vs Catie Hughes / Marie Dillon6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLori Lamey / Jessica Moyer vs Veronica Lidral / Sandra Napoli-D'Arco6-1, 6-1
2022-10-22vs CDTA E 40&O W3.5 Tam Kanev Sat 5 $22Split 22
L#1 DoublesKaren Tompkins / Nami Imaizumi vs Fran Thompson / Carol Paddock1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTheresa Whittington vs Svetlana Kanev1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMeg Greenberg / Marell Kowalski vs Lidia Dyjewski / Mary Patrick6-3, 4-1
W#3 DoublesIrene Carod / BARBARA SCHWAB vs Nicole Toft / Janet Mital6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesMeghan Kostyk / Robyn Kane vs Narissa Breger / Sue Christianson0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHannah Alphs Jackson vs Rachael Ulizio2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichele Canar / Laura Otto vs Julie Schwan / Laurie Sandman2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesIrene Carod / Meghan Kostyk vs Alicia Tisbo / Jillian Melinyshyn6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHannah Alphs Jackson vs Lori Bieniek6-7, 2-4
L#2 DoublesNami Imaizumi / Mary Hanrahan vs Jill Horan / Diane Thomason4-6, 2-4
L#3 DoublesMarell Kowalski / Lori Lamey vs Joan Cooney / Patricia Lozada0-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesDeborah Holt / Meghan Kostyk vs Danielle Locke / Erica Block2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMeg Greenberg / BARBARA SCHWAB vs Laura Nations / Colleen Roberts6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesIrene Carod / Jessica Moyer vs Naomi Katz / Melanie Brown6-4, 6-0
L#1 DoublesNami Imaizumi / Karen Tompkins vs Moon Kaneshiro / Kathy Mahowald3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Noble vs Yuliya Kravtsov4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMeghan Kostyk / Hannah Alphs Jackson vs Ginny Lazarus / Yan Gao6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Holt / Robyn Kane vs Katie Cousino / Carisa Conley5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA ESL 40&O W 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 40&O W3.5 MT Bann Christianson Sat 4 $255117723180
2CDTA E 40&O W3.5 Heritage Morrison Sun 12 $214215922204
3CDTA E 40&O W3.5 Northbrook Zorn Sun 7 $2442131124216
4CDTA E 40&O W3.5 Tam Lund Sat 1 $2233131126202
5CDTA E 40&O W3.5 TF Oak Park Roberts Fri 7 $2424131126200
6CDTA E 40&O W3.5 River Trails Hanrahan Sat 5 $222481632207
7CDTA E 40&O W3.5 Tam Kanev Sat 5 $221551940247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Jessica Moyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Nami Imaizumi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Lucie Kreidler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Hannah Alphs Jackson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Irene Carod
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Michele Canar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Meghan Kostyk
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.15
Amy Noble
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Marell Kowalski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Mary Hanrahan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Meredith Santucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Karen Tompkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Deborah Holt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.76
Theresa Whittington
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.67
Lori Lamey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Robyn Kane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
BARBARA SCHWAB
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Otto
published
Meg Greenberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nikki Ronstadt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Noble + Jessica Moyer2450% games+4.1% vs expected
Lucie Kreidler + Meg Greenberg111453% games+3.9% vs expected
Michele Canar + Lori Lamey2743% games−0.0% vs expected
Irene Carod + Meredith Santucci16556% games−0.4% vs expected
Michele Canar + Deborah Holt41044% games−1.0% vs expected
Mary Hanrahan + Amy Noble61148% games−3.7% vs expected
Lucie Kreidler + Jessica Moyer6349% games−3.7% vs expected
Mary Hanrahan + Marell Kowalski8654% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Moyer
63W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
Nami Imaizumi
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Lucie Kreidler
165W–131L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Hannah Alphs Jackson
44W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Irene Carod
50W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Michele Canar
37W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Meghan Kostyk
41W–40L career · 8 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Amy Noble
40W–38L career · 1 line in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Marell Kowalski
36W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Mary Hanrahan
81W–96L career · 1 line in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Meredith Santucci
57W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Karen Tompkins
22W–74L career · 4 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Deborah Holt
58W–85L career · 2 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Theresa Whittington
25W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Lori Lamey
36W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
Robyn Kane
21W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
BARBARA SCHWAB
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Otto
18W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meg Greenberg
35W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nikki Ronstadt
5W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.