Teams

LTCHerman/Farms. Tri C

2023 Lake USTA Tri Level Level 18 & Over · Women's Group C 2.5, 3.0 & 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-11vs LTRSica-Sheheen/Trump Tri CWon 20
W#2 DoublesJenna Germinario / Erin Taaffe vs Cindy Smithy / Erin Finn6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Ellen Herrmann / Stephanie Adili vs Audra Lenahan / Rebecca Shady6-2, 6-2
2023-07-27vs LTWGoodwin/Holbrook Tri CWon 10
W#1 DoublesKeri Norcross / Lisa Schacher vs Annette Mootilal / Anette Solmaz6-0, 6-3
2023-07-20vs LTLMele-Philpott/Peninsula Tri CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatrina Childers / Amy Gandy vs Shannon Hirschfeld / Cindy Long6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJenna Germinario / Jessica Babington vs Courtney Stachowski / Lisa Mele2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-13vs LTBWelch/Edgemoor Tri CWon 21
L#1 DoublesKeri Norcross / Erin Taaffe vs Teri Deuel / Cyndi Johnson6-7, 0-5
W#2 DoublesSarah Hoglund / Stephanie Adili vs Sheila Hebert / Beth Welch6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJamie Chapman / Mary Ellen Herrmann vs Lori Hissom / Amanda Burke7-5, 6-4
2023-07-06vs LTDAndiloro/Jetton Tri CWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatrina Childers / Lisa Schacher vs Leah Rand / Lori Anne Emlong6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSarah Hoglund / Jenna Germinario vs Barbara Smith / Kristy Del Monte6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Wolters / Mary Ellen Herrmann vs Megan Gibson / Barrie Moen6-0, 6-1
2023-06-29vs LMLaliberte/CSD Spartan pk Tri CWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Hoglund / Jessica Babington vs Sayra Brynn / Jennifer Ashford6-1, 6-3
2023-06-26vs LTBBarber - Hughes/Edgemoor Tri CWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Schacher / Katrina Childers vs Heather Hughes / Katherine Karnatz6-4, 6-3
2023-06-08vs LTCORR/WESTPORT. Tri CWon 21
W#1 DoublesKeri Norcross / Melissa Smith vs Mary Shelton / Patricia Ferguson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErin Taaffe / Sarah Hoglund vs Cindy Orr / Tracy Reiser6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCecile Herman / Mary Ellen Herrmann vs Donna Rowland / Sandra Self0-6, 1-6
2023-06-01vs LTSBEARDSLEE/Westport Tri CWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Schacher / Sarah Hoglund vs Tonya Watson / Candace Newman6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesErin Taaffe / Jenna Germinario vs Sandra Stinson / Stacy Beardslee6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Wolters / Mary Ellen Herrmann vs Jennifer Johnston / Andie Taylor6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group C 2.5, 3.0 & 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Sarah Hoglund
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Jennifer Wolters
published 3.5
3.40
Katrina Childers
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.39
Micaela Brewer
published
3.36
Keri Norcross
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.31
Stephanie Adili
published
3.26
Amy Gandy
published 3.5
3.22
Jenna Germinario
published
3.17
Lisa Schacher
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.08
Mary Ellen Herrmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Jamie Chapman
published
2.92
Jessica Babington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Erin Taaffe
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Schacher + Katrina Childers351955% games+2.1% vs expected
Amy Gandy + Katrina Childers3548% games+0.0% vs expected
Lisa Schacher + Keri Norcross281553% games−3.3% vs expected
Jessica Babington + Erin Taaffe1838% gamesnot enough data
Katrina Childers + Keri Norcross5255% gamesnot enough data
Keri Norcross + Sarah Hoglund3258% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Babington + Keri Norcross213 matchesnot enough data
Erin Taaffe + Keri Norcross213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Hoglund
94W–21L career · 15 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
4.01
3.5
Jennifer Wolters
58W–39L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Katrina Childers
158W–95L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Micaela Brewer
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
3.39
4
Keri Norcross
203W–139L career · 11 lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
3.36
Stephanie Adili
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Amy Gandy
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Jenna Germinario
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Lisa Schacher
177W–138L career · 11 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Mary Ellen Herrmann
77W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.08
Jamie Chapman
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Jessica Babington
60W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Erin Taaffe
69W–89L career · 7 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.