Teams

PINEY RUN

2024 Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-03-24vs 40 TerminettersLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelvin Williams / George Briscoe vs Desmond LaMar / Bill Keating2-6, 3-5
L#1 SinglesVerdell Wright vs Charlie JONES1-5
W#2 DoublesWaldo Ford / Christopher Dixon vs Salvatore Scanio / Lew Taylor6-4, 2-4
2024-03-17vs 40 TerminettersWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorge Briscoe / Melvin Williams vs Bill Keating / Charlie JONES6-3, 4-3
W#1 SinglesVerdell Wright vs Salvatore Scanio6-1, 3-2
L#2 DoublesSholnn Freeman / Waldo Ford vs Lew Taylor / Kudzai Mukushi2-6, 4-4
2024-03-09vs 40 TerminettersLost 03
L#1 DoublesLycurtis Wortham / Verdell Wright vs Desmond LaMar / Lew Taylor4-6, 3-5
L#1 SinglesMark Hill vs Salvatore Scanio4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWaldo Ford / Brian Stanley vs Raymond Lyons / Kudzai Mukushi3-6, 4-6
2024-03-02vs 40 TerminettersWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelvin Williams / Lycurtis Wortham vs Salvatore Scanio / Desmond LaMar3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMark Hill vs Raymond Lyons6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Stanley / Waldo Ford vs Bill Keating / Kudzai Mukushi6-4, 4-3
2024-02-25vs 40 TerminettersWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorge Briscoe / Melvin Williams vs Bill Keating / Salvatore Scanio7-6, 2-1
L#1 SinglesSholnn Freeman vs Charlie JONES4-6, 0-5
W#2 DoublesChristopher Dixon / Lycurtis Wortham vs Lew Taylor / Raymond Lyons6-3, 6-3
2024-02-18vs 40 TerminettersWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorge Briscoe / Melvin Williams vs Charlie JONES / Kudzai Mukushi7-6, 1-1
W#1 SinglesVerdell Wright vs Raymond Lyons6-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Dixon / Brian Stanley vs Lorenzo Chance / Salvatore Scanio2-6, 2-6
2024-02-04vs 40 TerminettersLost 03
L#1 DoublesLycurtis Wortham / Serge Hyacinthe vs Lew Taylor / Bryan Daguiar6-4, 1-4
L#1 SinglesChristopher Dixon vs Desmond LaMar2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelvin Williams / Waldo Ford vs Bill Keating / Charlie JONES2-6, 3-4
2024-01-21vs 40 TerminettersWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelvin Williams / Brian Stanley vs Bill Keating / Kudzai Mukushi1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSerge Hyacinthe vs Salvatore Scanio6-2, 4-3
W#2 DoublesChristopher Dixon / Mark Hill vs Charlie JONES / Raymond Lyons6-4, 6-1
2024-01-20vs 40 TerminettersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMark Hill vs Salvatore Scanio6-3, 3-5
L#2 DoublesMelvin Williams / Brian Stanley vs Kudzai Mukushi / Charlie JONES4-6, 3-6
2024-01-13vs 40 TerminettersLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Hill / Lycurtis Wortham vs Lorenzo Chance / Kudzai Mukushi6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChristopher Dixon vs Salvatore Scanio2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSerge Hyacinthe / Waldo Ford vs Desmond LaMar / Bryan Daguiar4-6, 2-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
George Briscoe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Waldo Ford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Christopher Dixon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.59
Brian Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.49
Penelope Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Melvin Williams
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lycurtis Wortham
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Mark Hill
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Serge Hyacinthe
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Sholnn Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Verdell Wright
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Briscoe + Melvin Williams314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

George Briscoe
13W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
Waldo Ford
7W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Christopher Dixon
3W–6L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Brian Stanley
5W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
2.59
Penelope Wilson
34W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49
Melvin Williams
14W–23L career · 8 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.49
Lycurtis Wortham
13W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Hill
21W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Serge Hyacinthe
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sholnn Freeman
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Verdell Wright
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.