Teams

40 Terminetters

2024 Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-03-24vs PINEY RUNWon 21
W#1 DoublesDesmond LaMar / Bill Keating vs Melvin Williams / George Briscoe6-2, 5-3
W#1 SinglesCharlie JONES vs Verdell Wright5-1
L#2 DoublesSalvatore Scanio / Lew Taylor vs Waldo Ford / Christopher Dixon6-4, 2-4
2024-03-17vs PINEY RUNLost 12
L#1 DoublesBill Keating / Charlie JONES vs George Briscoe / Melvin Williams3-6, 3-4
L#1 SinglesSalvatore Scanio vs Verdell Wright1-6, 2-3
W#2 DoublesLew Taylor / Kudzai Mukushi vs Sholnn Freeman / Waldo Ford6-2, 4-4
2024-03-09vs PINEY RUNWon 30
W#1 DoublesDesmond LaMar / Lew Taylor vs Lycurtis Wortham / Verdell Wright6-4, 5-3
W#1 SinglesSalvatore Scanio vs Mark Hill6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRaymond Lyons / Kudzai Mukushi vs Waldo Ford / Brian Stanley6-3, 6-4
2024-03-02vs PINEY RUNLost 12
W#1 DoublesSalvatore Scanio / Desmond LaMar vs Melvin Williams / Lycurtis Wortham6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRaymond Lyons vs Mark Hill0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBill Keating / Kudzai Mukushi vs Brian Stanley / Waldo Ford4-6, 3-4
2024-02-25vs PINEY RUNLost 12
L#1 DoublesBill Keating / Salvatore Scanio vs George Briscoe / Melvin Williams6-7, 1-2
W#1 SinglesCharlie JONES vs Sholnn Freeman6-4, 5-0
L#2 DoublesLew Taylor / Raymond Lyons vs Christopher Dixon / Lycurtis Wortham3-6, 3-6
2024-02-18vs PINEY RUNLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharlie JONES / Kudzai Mukushi vs George Briscoe / Melvin Williams6-7, 1-1
L#1 SinglesRaymond Lyons vs Verdell Wright6-6
W#2 DoublesLorenzo Chance / Salvatore Scanio vs Christopher Dixon / Brian Stanley6-2, 6-2
2024-02-04vs PINEY RUNWon 30
W#1 DoublesLew Taylor / Bryan Daguiar vs Lycurtis Wortham / Serge Hyacinthe4-6, 4-1
W#1 SinglesDesmond LaMar vs Christopher Dixon6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBill Keating / Charlie JONES vs Melvin Williams / Waldo Ford6-2, 4-3
2024-01-21vs PINEY RUNLost 12
W#1 DoublesBill Keating / Kudzai Mukushi vs Melvin Williams / Brian Stanley6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSalvatore Scanio vs Serge Hyacinthe2-6, 3-4
L#2 DoublesCharlie JONES / Raymond Lyons vs Christopher Dixon / Mark Hill4-6, 1-6
2024-01-20vs PINEY RUNWon 21
W#1 DoublesDesmond LaMar / Lew Taylor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesSalvatore Scanio vs Mark Hill3-6, 5-3
W#2 DoublesKudzai Mukushi / Charlie JONES vs Melvin Williams / Brian Stanley6-4, 6-3
2024-01-13vs PINEY RUNWon 21
L#1 DoublesLorenzo Chance / Kudzai Mukushi vs Mark Hill / Lycurtis Wortham2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSalvatore Scanio vs Christopher Dixon6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDesmond LaMar / Bryan Daguiar vs Serge Hyacinthe / Waldo Ford6-4, 4-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Charlie JONES
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.01
Lew Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Bryan Daguiar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Bill Keating
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Desmond LaMar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.79
Salvatore Scanio
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
2.75
Kudzai Mukushi
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.41
Raymond Lyons
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Lorenzo Chance
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan Daguiar + Desmond LaMar6355% games+10.7% vs expected
Kudzai Mukushi + Bill Keating4355% games+5.0% vs expected
Desmond LaMar + Lew Taylor5257% games+2.2% vs expected
Charlie JONES + Kudzai Mukushi224 matchesnot enough data
Kudzai Mukushi + Desmond LaMar224 matchesnot enough data
Charlie JONES + Bill Keating213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Charlie JONES
12W–11L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Lew Taylor
44W–40L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Bryan Daguiar
60W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Bill Keating
26W–45L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Desmond LaMar
101W–129L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Salvatore Scanio
14W–24L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Kudzai Mukushi
44W–87L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
Raymond Lyons
21W–43L career · 5 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.41
Lorenzo Chance
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.