Teams

Ke.Hurter40A

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over 2.5 · 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-26vs An.McNeil40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Hurter / Rebecca Harris vs Angie McNeill / Susan Gentry6-0, 6-1
2025-04-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela McGee / Megan Oneill vs Courtney Peterson / Stephanie Ratliff7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-12vs Me.McCaskill40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Harris / Angela McGee vs Bess Pitt / CarolAnn Wiggs5-7, 4-6
2025-03-29vs Da.Berry40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Hurter / Angela McGee vs Veda Bynum / Shannon Marconi6-4, 7-6
2025-03-08vs Te.Yasin40A2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesRebecca Harris / Kelly Hurter vs Henriette Nshunguye / Jeanna Hastie7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrandy Vannoy / Teran Canterbury vs Rhonda Blades / Patrice Farmer6-0, 6-1
2025-03-01vs An.McNeil40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Harris / Angela McGee vs Susan Potter / Lauren Hampton6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Megan Oneill
published
2.67
Angela McGee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.62
Kelly Hurter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.56
Allison Bubar
published 2.5
2.49
Meagan Moore
published
2.43
Teran Canterbury
published
2.27
Brandy Vannoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Nina Schweitzer
published
2.21
Debi Booker
published 2.5
2.17
Millie Raynor
published
2.02
Gina Hardy
published 2.5
Rebecca Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela McGee + Kelly Hurter8260% games+10.7% vs expected
Kelly Hurter + Brandy Vannoy3246% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Hurter + Millie Raynor224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Oneill
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
2.5
Angela McGee
47W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.67
2.5
Kelly Hurter
54W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
2.5
Allison Bubar
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.56
Meagan Moore
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Teran Canterbury
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.43
2.5
Brandy Vannoy
21W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
Nina Schweitzer
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Debi Booker
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
Millie Raynor
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Gina Hardy
2W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Rebecca Harris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.