Teams

Mediterra / Ferraez

2026 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-01vs Cambier / GustLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebra Dager / Ginger Ferraez vs Allison Baker / Sheila MacNicol6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebra Gardner Hussey / Joan Steere vs Lisa Gust / Kristy Cardina2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebbi Butz / Nancy Rutherford vs Diana DeFulviis / Julia Lannon7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-11-24vs Naples Bay Resort / StaropoliWon 20
W#1 DoublesRegina Gracie / Ginger Ferraez vs Doris Duignan / Gail Kennedy6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Bauer / Debbi Butz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-21vs Cambier / GustWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebra Dager / Ginger Ferraez vs Julia Lannon / Kristy Cardina4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaula Hinegardner / Nancy Rutherford vs Lori Poulin / Barb Dellasala3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Bauer / Debbi Butz vs Laura Contri / Allison Baker3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-11-17vs Grey Oaks / WerchekLost 12
L#1 DoublesGinger Ferraez / Debra Dager vs Karyn Sardar / Nancy Harbert4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebra Gardner Hussey / Christine Carter vs Karen Morand / Janet Seidl7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDebbi Butz / Paula Hinegardner vs Susan Caskey / Peggy Hogan0-6, 2-6
2025-11-03vs COLLIER/Adult55&over8.0W/ B. JonesLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebra Dager / Ginger Ferraez vs Joanne Belcastro / Susan Odonnell1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDebra Gardner Hussey / Joan Steere vs Christina Zajac / Ann Sherwood2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaura King / Paula Hinegardner vs Lisa Ruffolo / Debi Reed6-7, 1-6
2025-10-27vs Olde Cypress / NavarroLost 12
L#1 DoublesGinger Ferraez / Debra Dager vs Kristen Catino / Carol Halliday3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Rutherford / Laura King vs Mercedes Baumann / Gretchen Landolt6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoan Steere / Debra Gardner Hussey vs Minok Allen / Susanne Navarro6-2, 6-0
2025-10-20vs Pelican Marsh / PrenticeLost 03
L#1 DoublesGinger Ferraez / Sheryl Stephenson vs Helena Roeper / Karey Hogan1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Steere / Debra Gardner Hussey vs Greta Beatty / Minde Shinnick2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaura King / Debbi Butz vs Fiona Prentice / Stacey Mondragon4-6, 3-6
2025-10-13vs Island Country Club / CrinesLost 12
L#1 DoublesGinger Ferraez / Sheryl Stephenson vs Connie Johnson / Jennifer Hansen1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura King / Debbi Butz vs Julie Kastholm / Suzanne Messere4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRegina Gracie / Joan Steere vs Keely Miller / Mary Nugent5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Christine Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.79
Debra Dager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Debra Gardner Hussey
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.31
Debbi Butz
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Nancy Rutherford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ginger Ferraez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joan Steere
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Laura King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Paula Hinegardner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Regina Gracie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sheryl Stephenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Bauer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Dager + Ginger Ferraez3550% gamesnot enough data
Joan Steere + Debra Gardner Hussey1641% gamesnot enough data
Debra Dager + Sheryl Stephenson224 matchesnot enough data
Laura King + Paula Hinegardner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Carter
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11
4
Debra Dager
47W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Debra Gardner Hussey
5W–7L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Debbi Butz
28W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Nancy Rutherford
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Ginger Ferraez
4W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joan Steere
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura King
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paula Hinegardner
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Regina Gracie
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sheryl Stephenson
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Bauer
11W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.