Teams

SOAKS TEBEAUX

2022 FW USTA · USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Kimberly Grogan
published
3.77
Gilda Tebeaux
published 4
3.32
Michele Solis
published
3.26
Gracie Santana
published 3.5
3.17
Louise Otto
published
3.16
Michelle Hyland
published
3.13
Allison Nicks
published 3.5
3.12
Antorrya Calderon
published 3.5
3.10
Stacy Burdick
published
2.90
Linda Kiraly
published
2.84
Ruth Valtierrez
published
2.79
Cindie Spradlin
published 3
2.71
Sonjia Fields
published
2.64
Joy Blaha
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gilda Tebeaux + Kimberly Grogan121354% games+6.7% vs expected
Gracie Santana + Antorrya Calderon41044% games−4.2% vs expected
Michele Solis + Cindie Spradlin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Grogan
62W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Gilda Tebeaux
37W–32L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Michele Solis
35W–33L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Gracie Santana
18W–28L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Louise Otto
19W–17L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Michelle Hyland
35W–28L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Allison Nicks
12W–20L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Antorrya Calderon
7W–29L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.12
Stacy Burdick
18W–28L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Linda Kiraly
18W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
Ruth Valtierrez
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Cindie Spradlin
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
Sonjia Fields
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Joy Blaha
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.