Teams

Johnston/55s/3.0/SC

2026 Man · Cov Mixed 55 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Chris Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.93
Alison Beebe
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
Angelique Daigle
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.91
Cathy West
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.90
BenF Brown
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jane Bearden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Moser
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kirk Michel
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Leigh Hardy
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Ray Dussold
usually #3 Doubles 92%, also #1 Doubles 8% · published
Renan Esquivel
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Ricky Bearden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Schuetz
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Suzie Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
William Gillane
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Moser + Angelique Daigle3247% gamesnot enough data
William Gillane + Chris Johnston2343% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Schuetz + Suzie Lambert314 matchesnot enough data
Suzie Lambert + Cathy West224 matchesnot enough data
Angelique Daigle + BenF Brown404 matchesnot enough data
Chris Johnston + BenF Brown314 matchesnot enough data
Kim Moser + William Gillane303 matchesnot enough data
Suzie Lambert + Ray Dussold303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chris Johnston
19W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Alison Beebe
64W–33L career · 35 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Angelique Daigle
12W–4L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Cathy West
41W–27L career · 36 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
BenF Brown
31W–16L career · 21 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
Jane Bearden
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kim Moser
23W–17L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kirk Michel
20W–5L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leigh Hardy
13W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ray Dussold
25W–5L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Renan Esquivel
9W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ricky Bearden
5W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Schuetz
8W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzie Lambert
27W–18L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Gillane
34W–30L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.