Teams

LVTA ORANGE

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-27vs CSU GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesColby Mueller / Craig Smith vs Jake Milliken / Ian Duque5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesChris Ahn vs David Augustine2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Jackson / Harim Gonzalez vs Ian Hay-Arthur / Brenden Arndt7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-20vs CSU GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesColby Mueller / Daniel Jackson vs Giovanni Iosue / Sam Bell3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTaylor Nguyen vs Ian Powers1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesShawn Farnell / Ryan Selby vs John McNally / Adam Baker6-2, 6-4
2026-08-06vs MLF REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Selby / Christopher Mitchell vs Scott Bolton / Michael Boyle3-6, 2-3
L#1 SinglesChris Ahn vs Andrew Meister1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Smith / Harim Gonzalez vs Chad Schneider / Zachary Bekkedahl2-6, 4-6
2026-07-30vs MLF BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesShawn Farnell / Ryan Selby vs Tom Weller / Zac Wyse6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChristopher Mitchell vs Maxwell Dirvonas6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTaylor Nguyen / Craig Smith vs Ken Kawakami / Shannon Doyle6-3, 6-2
2026-07-23vs CSU GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRyan Selby / Shawn Farnell vs Jake Milliken / Ian Hay-Arthur4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesColby Mueller / Harim Gonzalez vs David Augustine / Noah Sussman6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Christopher Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.31
Shawn Farnell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Colby Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Ryan Selby
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.14
Harim Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Taylor Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.96
Chris Ahn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Selby + Shawn Farnell9259% games+5.4% vs expected
Harim Gonzalez + Colby Mueller314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Mitchell
6W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Shawn Farnell
78W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Colby Mueller
62W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Ryan Selby
55W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Harim Gonzalez
33W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
4.14
Taylor Nguyen
18W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Chris Ahn
1W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.