Teams

PTC NAVY

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-06vs HRCA-N PINKLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarci Pisciotta / Elizabeth Barnes vs Andrea Pickett / Rachelle Jeppson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrigitta Robinson / Katy Cafazza vs Mollie Anderson / Angie Smart2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-30vs GCC PINKLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarci Pisciotta / Julie Thorn vs Ilana Larson / Marissa Sproles3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Peacock / Katy Cafazza vs Andrea Ellsworth / NICOLE WADSWORTH2-6, 1-6
2024-07-23vs SS-H PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarci Pisciotta / Katy Cafazza vs Jennifer Cohen / Ashley Hastedt6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrigitta Robinson / Hayley Servatius vs Shauna Sanidas / Priscilla Hawkinson3-6, 4-6
2024-07-16vs SKY BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Snyder / Katy Cafazza vs Candace Kristensson / Elizabeth Wallace7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrigitta Robinson / Elizabeth Barnes vs Emily Hoagland / Claire Margolf6-4, 6-4
2024-07-09vs HW NAVYWon 20
W#1 SinglesKaty Cafazza vs Carina Clancy6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarci Pisciotta / Elizabeth Barnes vs Barbara Superka / Whitney Albro6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-02vs HRCA-N PINKLost 01
L#1 SinglesKaty Cafazza vs Mollie Anderson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-25vs GCC PINKWon 10
W#1 SinglesMarci Pisciotta vs Marissa Sproles6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Marci Pisciotta
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.39
Caroline Cook
published 2.5
2.34
Katy Cafazza
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.13
Evelyn Snyder
published
2.12
Brigitta Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.84
Hayley Servatius
published
Julie Thorn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evelyn Snyder + Hayley Servatius3249% games+4.0% vs expected
Evelyn Snyder + Brigitta Robinson3348% games−4.7% vs expected
Marci Pisciotta + Katy Cafazza8070% gamesnot enough data
Evelyn Snyder + Katy Cafazza2444% gamesnot enough data
Brigitta Robinson + Katy Cafazza4257% gamesnot enough data
Julie Thorn + Brigitta Robinson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Marci Pisciotta
100W–89L career · 5 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Caroline Cook
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Katy Cafazza
89W–78L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.34
Evelyn Snyder
21W–26L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Brigitta Robinson
56W–86L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Hayley Servatius
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Julie Thorn
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.