Teams

GCC PINK

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-30vs PTC NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesIlana Larson / Marissa Sproles vs Marci Pisciotta / Julie Thorn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Ellsworth / NICOLE WADSWORTH vs Stephanie Peacock / Katy Cafazza6-2, 6-1
2024-07-23vs HW NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNICOLE WADSWORTH / Andrea Ellsworth vs Bridgette Ward / Heather Prier6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesIlana Larson / Kelly Mauro vs Jill Ellsworth / Whitney Albro6-4, 6-2
2024-07-16vs SS-H PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesIlana Larson / Marissa Sproles vs Shauna Sanidas / Emily Becker6-0, 6-0
2024-07-09vs HRCA-N PINKWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarissa Sproles / Ilana Larson vs Debbie Easton / Andrea Pickett6-0, 6-2
2024-07-02vs SKY BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesIlana Larson / Marissa Sproles vs Candace Kristensson / Emily Hoagland6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndrea Ellsworth / NICOLE WADSWORTH vs Jenine Camins / Mary Downing6-0, 6-3
2024-06-25vs PTC NAVYSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMarissa Sproles vs Marci Pisciotta1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesShannon Danitz / Andrea Ellsworth vs Julie Thorn / Caroline Cook6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Andrea Ellsworth
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Marissa Sproles
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.63
Ilana Larson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Sonya Kubik
published
2.53
Sarah Schnittman
published
2.53
NICOLE WADSWORTH
published
2.31
Kelly Mauro
published
2.24
Shannon Danitz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

NICOLE WADSWORTH + Andrea Ellsworth6254% games+5.0% vs expected
Ilana Larson + Marissa Sproles452655% games−3.6% vs expected
Marissa Sproles + Andrea Ellsworth4259% gamesnot enough data
Ilana Larson + Andrea Ellsworth134 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Schnittman + Sonya Kubik123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrea Ellsworth
50W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Marissa Sproles
61W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Ilana Larson
72W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Sonya Kubik
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62
Sarah Schnittman
7W–26L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
NICOLE WADSWORTH
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.53
Kelly Mauro
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.31
Shannon Danitz
14W–22L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.