Teams

Piu Forte

2025 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.29 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-18vs Dudes and DudettesWon 20
W#1 DoublesRichard English / Liz Crookston vs Todd Merritt / Sonia Ivanova6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKen Hosac / Kristina Winterling vs Jason Bish / Amy Taivalkoski6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-26vs NetFlicksWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Clark / Jennifer Johnson vs Katherine Johnson / Ryan Hales6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKevin McDonald / Stephanie McDonald vs Griffin Staudt / Fariss Mcgee6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-19vs Not My FaultWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Clark / Jennifer Johnson vs Daniel Waldram / Kay Stoll6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKevin McDonald / Stephanie McDonald vs Mark Bell / Kristin Mumford6-3, 7-6
2025-04-06vs Fuzzy BallsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristopher Clark / Andrea Reynolds vs Gary Loeb / Christina Elder6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLiz Crookston / Jeff Stanley vs Leah Hart / Lee Parsons4-6, 0-6
2025-03-30vs Aces & CervezasLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Clark / Tannan Koehl vs Mardianne Howell / Randy Howell2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Meltzer / Kristina Winterling vs Stacia Albiston / David Roberts2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Stanley / Jennifer Johnson vs Leann Gilberg / Jay Vavrek3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-23vs Guys & Dolls w/Balls 7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Smith / Lora Bonser vs Richard Leaton / Chrissy Rose6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie McDonald / Kevin McDonald vs Andi Trued / Adam Panitch3-6, 1-6
2025-03-08Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristopher Clark / Jennifer Johnson vs Scott Stewart / Ashley Bryngelson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKen Hosac / Stephanie McDonald vs Troy Casper / Anna Orrison2-6, 3-6
2025-03-02vs Central PerkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMark Smith / Stephanie McDonald vs Anthony Tomyn / Allison Young1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDaniel Meltzer / Lora Bonser vs Patrik Martinet / Christy Siemons7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Greyhounds12131821247
2Double the Fun112271231305
3Love Bites94271232269
4Mismatched94241535309
5Aces & Cervezas94221740341
6Guys & Dolls w/Balls 7.085251435321
7NetFlicks58152452385
8Piu Forte58142557397
9Not My Fault49182151388
10Dudes and Dudettes01282860389

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Christopher Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Tannan Koehl
published
Mark Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Reynolds
published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
3.11
Lora Bonser
published 3.5
2.82
Richard English
published
Daniel Meltzer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Matt Koehl
published 3
Jeff Stanley
published
Ken Hosac
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kevin McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Liz Crookston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tannan Koehl + Matt Koehl151154% games+3.6% vs expected
Andrea Reynolds + Richard English1733% games−13.0% vs expected
Jennifer Johnson + Christopher Clark5454% gamesnot enough data
Ken Hosac + Andrea Reynolds404 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Reynolds + Daniel Meltzer404 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Reynolds + Christopher Clark224 matchesnot enough data
Richard English + Kristina Winterling123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christopher Clark
44W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Tannan Koehl
92W–61L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Mark Smith
38W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Reynolds
84W–122L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Jennifer Johnson
28W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
3
Kristina Winterling
109W–69L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
3.5
Lora Bonser
117W–110L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Richard English
23W–57L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
3
Daniel Meltzer
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Matt Koehl
57W–73L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.52
Jeff Stanley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ken Hosac
18W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin McDonald
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Liz Crookston
25W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.